There are quite a lot of people who think my aspirations are not possible. That's a good thing. We don't need to really worry about these people very much, because since they don't think it's possible, they won't take us very seriously and they will not actually try to stop us until it's too late. ~ Peter Thiel
I recently read - and was appalled by - Max Chafkin’s The Contrarian, a biography of the controversial billionaire investor, Peter Thiel.
Trying to read this & I’m honestly appalled.— Bronwyn Williams (@bronwynwilliams) November 20, 2021
The author comes across as a perverted teacher who joins in the taunting of a bullied child, leaving the reader with the impression bulling is fine, mockery of sexual preference is fine, as long as the victim is smarter than you. pic.twitter.com/vJMyWSCVbk
However, the quality, originality, and blatantly biased character-assassination-by-association, what really bothered me was the tone.
Regardless of your views about Peter Thiel’s politics or business (rest assured, Chafkin leaves no doubt as to his opinions thereof), and whether you believe the man is a hero or an antihero, it is hard to side with an author who joins in mocking his subject alongside his self-confessed high-school and college bullies. It’s worth noting that the Chafkin did manage to track down and interview the bullies, who furnished him with all sorts of stories about how they made (or at least tried to) make the young, socially awkward Thiel’s teenage years miserable. This pattern of snide glee at the expense of someone else’s privacy and comfort extended to the copious paragraphs that rehashing the many gossip column inches dedicated to discussing and demeaning Thiel’s sexuality over the years.
The message the reader is left with is that it’s perfectly fine to mock the looks, personality and even the sexuality of people who are smarter and richer than you are (even if they were not, in fact, more successful than you at the time of the insult - this handy excuse can apparently be post-dated). In fact, the impression is that the smart and successful somehow deserve to be put in their place by their less successful counterparts.
I find this a particularly abhorrent insinuation, the idea that somehow weakness and relative failure are somehow correlated with virtue, while success is some sort of a character flaw.
Far from being an original thought, I see this dynamic playing out all too often in boardrooms, where mediocre managers and envious colleagues instead of supporting and promoting the most talented and successful employees decide instead to cut them down to size, to draw the exceptional down to the average.
This sort of mediocracy mentality can cripple organisational culture. Talent and hard work is not something to be flattened down to the lowest common denominator, it is something to be nurtured and cultivated.