Most Read

  • AI and retail: A South African conundrum
    AI and retail: A South African conundrum
    Artificial intelligence (AI) is being successfully deployed in the global retail sector, but it needs to be used carefully in the South African context, taking into account specific market characteristics. By Wendy Tembedza
  • Paula Hulley
    Paula Hulley, IAB SA CEO, steps down
    Haydn Townsend, IAB SA chair has announced that Paula Hulley, IAB SA CEO will not be renewing her contract into 2022.
  • Source:
    Netflix looks to support Black representation in film and TV
    On 16 September 2021, Netflix announced a commitment of $400,000 (R5.5m) in the form of a grant and creation of scholarships to extend the support for Black representation in the film and TV industry to the creative ecosystem in South Africa.
  • Net#work BBDO has a 'meltdown'
    Net#work BBDO has a 'meltdown'
    Everything has changed. That is a given. And so when Net#work BBDO moved into their new offices and started unpacking the 27 years of awards haul for the shelves, the leadership team had, well, a meltdown.
  • Henriëtte Loubser, Netwerk24's editor-in-chief
    Netwerk24 undergoing a metamorphosis
    Netwerk24, the acting digital home of Media24's Afrikaans titles, is moving to a new platform in early October. It will also be launching a brand new app.
  • Source: ©Andriy Popov
    The need to curb money laundering
    The Anti-Money Laundering (AML) market makes up a significant proportion of the global Gross Domestic Product (GDP), but the real issue is that money laundering is used to fund other illicit activities, such as smuggling, bribery, corruption, cybercrime, illegal arms dealing, human trafficking, modern slavery, and more. By Amit Singh
  • Building culture out of discontent
    Building culture out of discontent
    Culture is a shared ethos of an organisation; it is the glue that holds a business together. It is this intangible 'thing' that attracts prospective employees and clients to a company. By wayne bischoff
  • #OrchidsandOnions: Dove ticks all the right boxes
    #OrchidsandOnions: Dove ticks all the right boxes
    Complete package: Timing is good, message is good, and Siya is a great ambassador; Bidvest gesture an example other companies would do well to emulate. By Brendan Seery
  • How to pivot your agency in a post-pandemic world
    How to pivot your agency in a post-pandemic world
    "Pivot, pivooooot, pivooooot!" Issued by Silversoft
  • Source: Clicks Group
    Clicks reveals Sasria claim following unrest totals R726m
    The Clicks Group has said that its total South African Special Risks Insurance Association (Sasria) claim related to the civil unrest in July amounts to R726m, comprising loss of stock of R522m (carrying value of R334m), replacement of fixed assets of R182m (carrying value R61m) and other costs of R22m.
Show more
Advertise on Bizcommunity

Subscribe to industry newsletters

Digital signature on an Offer to Purchase - is it legally valid?

Electronic signatures have been a relevant and current topic of conversation, with the legal stance on the validity of such signatures within the context of property sale agreements being clear up until recently.
Leigh-Anne Kriel
Leigh-Anne Kriel

The case of Borcherds and Another v Duxbury and Others, heard by the Eastern Cape High Court in 2020, has clouded this clarity and created a degree of uncertainty regarding the use of electronic signatures in the context of sale of immovable property agreements. So, if you are buying or selling – best take note now.

The legal position prior to the Borcherds v Duxbury case

The Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002 (ECTA) recognises electronically concluded transactions and allows for the use of electronic signatures.

The relevant exception in terms of ECTA, is that any agreement concluded in terms of the Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981 (ALA) may not be validly signed by means of an electronic signature. Sale of immovable property agreements and long-term lease agreements fall under ALA, and as such, is required by law to be signed in wet ink in order to be valid and enforceable.

The Borcherds v Duxbury case

The issue before the court relevant to this discussion was the validity of an electronically signed sale of immovable property agreement. In this case, the seller used a mobile app DocuSign, which allowed him to sign the offer of purchase by attaching a stored signature of the user, which was created by capturing an image of a paper document with his wet ink signature.

The offer of purchase was then disputed based on the electronic signature, and the court found that the offer of purchase was valid and enforceable due to the signature satisfactorily representing intention to be bound to the agreement.

The judgment highlights the court’s approach to signatures as having always been pragmatic, not formalistic. The judge considered whether the method of the signature used fulfils the function of a signature (which is to authenticate the identity of the signatory) rather than to insist on the form of the signature used. The judge stated that
the requirement of signature may conceivably be satisfied by an electronic signature, where a handwritten signature is digitised and attached to an electronic document.
Although this judgment provides clarity on the issue of using a digital signature to buy immovable property, it is advised that pre-existing, relevant law be considered.

Conflict of Law

This judgment conflicts with the legal position set out in the ECTA, as it does not refer to section 4(4) of the ECTA, which provides that “this Act must not be construed as giving validity to any transaction mentioned in Schedule 2”.

Schedule 2 of the ECTA sets out categories of transactions that may not be signed electronically. These include agreements for the sale of immovable property; long-term leases of land exceeding 20 years; a last will and testament and Bills of exchange. In contravening the ECTA, the judgement by default contravenes ALA, by giving force to an electronic signature for the sale of immovable property.

The court in Borcherds v Duxbury did not consider the ECTA, and if it had, they might have ruled differently.


In light of the conflicting law and uncertainty created by this judgment, it is advisable to ensure that all agreements for the sale for immovable property are signed in wet ink - and not digital - until the legal position is finally clarified.

About the author

Leigh-Anne Kriel is a recent LLB graduate from Stellenbosch, working as a Candidate Attorney at SchoemanLaw Incorporated in Cape Town.
Email: az.oc.walnameohcs@seiriuqne
To celebrate Biz's 20th birthday month, get 20% off all rate card products:

Let's do Biz