Legal onslaught against bargaining councils receives temporary setback

© epitavi – za.fotolia.com

All the applicant union wanted was for the High Court in Pretoria to declare the Minister's decision to extend the periods of operation of the MIBCO Main Collective Agreement and Administrative Collective Agreement to specific dates unlawful and invalid. The union contended that the two agreements were not in force when the Minister extended them and did not as is other matters raise any constitutional issue.

On behalf of the respondents opposing the application, it was argued that the issues of bargaining council collective agreements and their extension fall within the function expressly provided for in the Labour Relations Act (LRA) and which falls exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Labour Court. The applicant contended that the High Court who heard this matter had concurrent jurisdiction by virtue of the provisions of section 157 (1) and (2) of the LRA.

Conflicting decisions

The court had to consider the previous conflicting decisions in in the High Court. In Valuline v Minister of Labour (2013 (4) 326 (KZP)) it was held that the High Court had concurrent jurisdiction in a similar matter. In the recent decision in O'Thorpe Construction and Others v The Minister of Labour and Others (case 9380/2013 in Cape Town), the High Court declined to hear the matter for lack of jurisdiction saying the matter belonged in the Labour Court.

The court in the Misa-matter analysed the two conflicting decisions against the background of the previous relevant Constitutional Court decisions in Chirwa v Transnet Limited and Others (2008 (4) SA 367 (CC)) and Gcaba v Minister of Safety and Security and Others (2010 (1) SA 238 (CC)).

The judgment in the Misa-matter emphasised that the LRA created a specialist court in labour matters with similar status to the High Court with exclusive jurisdiction to decide matters arising from the LRA. The Labour Court has been created to deal with causes of action that are founded on the provisions of the Bill of Rights which arise from employment and labour relations.

The court concluded that this particular matter of the extension of agreements falls exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Labour Court. It is a matter founded in the LRA. The union's application was dismissed without the court considering the merits of the union's complaint as the High Court did not have jurisdiction to entertain the dispute.