Top stories



Marketing & Media947 Joburg Day 2026 transforms into a cultural playground with all-star line-up
Primedia Broadcasting 22 Jun 2026

2017 was not a good year for companies handling crises. The number of casualties was alarming. We had our pick of it – from motoring, to beverages, to aviation, and everything in between.
You know the names! Ford and the Kuga fires; United Airlines' ‘Removal of a Passenger’; Adidas' ‘Insensitive Boston Marathon Email’; Uber’s handling of seemingly unrelated crises; Steinhoff’s exposé that could lead them to become the biggest bankruptcy in South African corporate history; Unilever’s Dove ad; to name but a few…
Some did better than others. Some failed in round one, but at least went back for round two and got it right then. Some never bothered to try harder.
While communication professionals should know how critical it is to plan for crises, it remains clear that many are woefully unprepared when a crisis hits. As we enter 2018, we pause to consider what we could be doing better. How could a little – or appropriate – level of annual preparation help pave the way to be ready for a crisis?
It’s all in the terminology. A good communications expert knows when an issue is escalating, and what to do to prevent it from becoming a crisis. Or, if already a crisis, what steps to take to mitigate the reputational impact.
Ford is a now classic case study of what not to do – the issues were not tackled for months leading to the ‘crisis’; and once they were in crisis mode did not adequately address three basic phases: tell all and tell fast; clarify the facts; and share what you are doing about it now and what will be done to prevent it from happening again (there’s a lot to be said under each banner, and a few tips are below).
It’s about a scary 7-letter word that so many companies don’t have in their vocabulary: apology. When a brand mishap occurs, genuinely apologise. Few people are beyond understanding that thinks can go wrong. But if you don’t show empathy, you’re dead in the water.
Here is an example: Adidas issued an apology after a marketing email to customers who participated in the 2017 Boston Marathon was branded “insensitive” and “extremely inappropriate”. The email, sent out by Adidas Running, carried the subject line: "Congrats, you survived the Boston Marathon!" The wording was slammed on social media, with recipients deeming it “too soon” after the attack on the 2013 Boston Marathon, in which three people were killed and more than 250 injured, after two bombs were detonated close to the finish line.
What did Adidas do? They apologised for the email.
— adidas (@adidasUS) April 18, 2017
This is how you do it right:
All things said and done, it will be the organisations that understand, protect and enhance their reputational assets that will maintain shareholder value and brand equity in the long run. The real question is, will you be one of them in 2018?
