
Top stories


Logistics & TransportIata urges global safeguards for aircraft systems as 5G/6G rollout continues
17 hours

AgricultureAgricultural exports from Africa are not doing well. Four ways to change that
Lilac Nachum 18 hours


Continues Watt, “The 1 + 1 = 3 formula of incongruity and cleverness reigns. Yahoo adland. There seemed to be a number of ideas that were just better art directed versions of ads and formulae we’ve already seen (and judged), and Poster still relies heavily on print ads blown up.
“Outdoor seems the freshest category since creatives are actually being creative when applying their minds to ambient and activation. Well done here.”
Watt goes on to explain that the judges agreed to prototype a slightly different system this month: “The work would be judged as normal, but before the actual scores and winners were announced, we’d open the floor for debate. The agreement was that the debate could not alter the original scores the judges had given.
“The result was interesting, fascinating and disturbing (in that order).
“While the general standard of the work was average, the work that got most debate didn’t actually win. And the winning work didn’t initiate much debate at all. Which creates debate regarding the science of averages and its effect on isolating winners. There’s certainly some work to be done here and I’ll be asking the exco to consider a more decisive system,” concludes Watt.
Newspaper
Magazine
Outdoor
TV/Cinema
Radio
The judging panel for February 2007 comprised:
Watt’s parting words of wisdom: “Until [next time], keep the dream alive, have fun and consider whether your next great ad should even be an ad?”