
Top stories


Logistics & TransportIata urges global safeguards for aircraft systems as 5G/6G rollout continues
18 hours

AgricultureAgricultural exports from Africa are not doing well. Four ways to change that
Lilac Nachum 19 hours



In line with the April print, all mineral groups recorded negative year-on-year growth with the largest detractor from the May headline reading being ascribed to iron ore production, which contracted 66.3% y/y and shaved off 7.4 percentage points (ppt). This was followed by platinum group metals (PGMs) (-27.3% y/y and -6.6ppt); manganese ore (-45.4% y/y and -3ppt); “other” non-metallic minerals (-46.7% y/y and -2.8ppt); and coal (-9.6% and -2.6ppt).
On a seasonally adjusted basis, mining output jumped by 44% month-on-month (m/m) in May, which can almost entirely be attributed to base effects. In fact, April and March production plunged 36.8% and 19.3% m/m respectively.
We anticipate that the June mining production print will improve relative to the previous two months as most mining activity was permitted to scale up toward operating at full capacity under level 3 lockdown regulations. However, miners will still have to contend with several headwinds, including containing potential Covid-19 outbreaks, lower capacity utilisation rates (due to suboptimal operating conditions), load-shedding as well as weak external demand from many of our trading partners.