
Top stories





Marketing & MediaDaily Maverick launches a groundbreaking local bureau in Nelson Mandela Bay
Daily Maverick 12 hours

Tourism & TravelTumi celebrates 50th anniversary with campaign, 'Made for you since 1975'
Tumi 2 days
More news















Orkut, its social network, has largely failed to catch the world's imagination (although apparently it's big in Brazil). Google Latitude came and went. Many, myself included, have yet to quite figure out a reason to care about Google Wave, where it fits, or rather, what it is exactly. Today, Wave still remains a highly-geeked out curiosity — and I predict it will probably stay that way.
There's a feeling, one I agree with, that - unlike Google's other poor attempts at social - this latest will most likely work. And that's largely down to the Gmail integration, the simple user interface, and the initial auto-following - removing the initial fatigue factor, getting you right into it.
But along with Buzz comes more noise, more distraction, less time. Less valuable time. Buzz's most valuable feature may also be its most irritating. Without a doubt it was a genius move to house Google Buzz in Gmail. It makes sense because this is where most of our communication happens, so why not see your “buzzes” there too? (Is that what we'll call them?)
In fact, on the one hand, by making Buzz part of our email, Google may be taking micro-blogging/lifestreaming to more of a mainstream audience. Those who never found reason to tweet may now find a reason to buzz.
On the other hand, our email boxes are cluttered places these days, so we don't need more distraction and more noise — no matter how pithy a buzz or a tweet. No, of course we don't, but the answer to this probably lies in personal discipline and improving algorithms that filter important conversations in a more sophisticated way. Look forward to that day.
What I like about Buzz:
What I dislike about Buzz:
• Adapted from original blog post published 11 February 2010.