Subscribe & Follow
Jobs
- SEO and Content Creator Intern Cape Town
- Media - Sales Manager - Digital or Broadcasting Exp Essential or Both Johannesburg
- Content Creator Cape Town
- Head of Performance Marketing South Africa
- Journalist Intern Johannesburg
- Acount Manager Johannesburg
- Senior Media Sales Executive - OOH Johannesburg
- Multi Media Journalist | South Coast Sun Durban
- Paid Media Specialist Cape Town
- Editorial Intern - (Bona) Cape Town
Broadcasting Amendment Bill sent back to Parliament
“The President signed a letter this week, authorising the bill to be referred back to Parliament for reconsideration,” presidential spokesperson Thabo Masebe said today, Tuesday, 10 February 2009, during a news clip on SABC Morning Live.
Numerous objections
Masebe added that the presidency has received numerous objections from various groups, including opposition political parties, raising concerns about the constitutionality of certain sections of the bill.
Motlanthe's decision not to sign the bill into law is likely to frustrate many of his ANC comrades who, last month, put him under heavy pressure over the outstanding bill. ANC chief whip Nyami Booi was said to have engaged Motlanthe over the delay to enact the bill that would have seen the allegedly problematic and ‘partial' board swiftly given the boot.
ANC insiders claim SABC news director Snuki Zikalala and some of his political journalists, including Sophie Mokoena, are supporters of Congress of the People (COPE) - accusations rejected by Zikalala as baseless and unfounded.
The Star newspaper quoted Zikalala as saying: “If there is evidence that some journalists sit in at COPE meetings, they must produce evidence.
“At the SABC, we don't want allegations which are not tested. Within the newsroom we don't want any journalist to practice [political] activism.”
Many loopholes
Some media groups have said the bill is ‘unworkable' and has many loopholes in its current form. Media Monitoring Africa (MMA) executive director William Bird said, “The hurry to get it passed and to remove the current board would seem to be at odds with the essential requirement of due process.
“While this may sound like a small issue, it is absolutely essential that due process is integral to the removal of the board as a whole or on an individual basis.
“If it is not, it would open the board up to the most disastrous potential of being subject to the political whims of any party that decides that they are not happy with a particular board.”
This is the second bill to be rejected by Motlanthe in the past 10 days. Early this month, the president also referred the Films and Publications Amendment Bill back to Parliament.