News

Industries

Companies

Jobs

Events

People

Video

Audio

Galleries

Submit content

My Account

Advertise with us

Search jobs
Advertise your job vacancies

    Subscribe & Follow


    ARB says CapeTalk's Outsurance pointsmen advertisement is misleading

    CapeTalk has been instructed to withdraw the Outsurance pointsmen programme related to the City of Cape Town Metropolitan Area advertisement in its current format from Cape Talk radio or any other radio station that is primarily targeted at the City of Cape Town by the Directorate of the Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB).
    CapeTalk has been instructed to withdraw the Outsurance pointsmen programme related to the City of Cape Town Metropolitan Area advertisement by the ARB (Image: @ Auto Top
    CapeTalk has been instructed to withdraw the Outsurance pointsmen programme related to the City of Cape Town Metropolitan Area advertisement by the ARB (Image: @ Auto Top Top Auto

    This follows a consumer complaint against the radio station and a series of 30-second radio commercials and “live reads” broadcast on CapeTalk, which promote the Outsurance Pointsmen programme.

    The Complainant contends that the advertising creates a misleading impression that the Outsurance Pointsmen service is presently available to motorists in the City of Cape Town, when this is not the case, and that the frequency and repetition of the advertising is likely to reinforce this impression among consumers in the area concerned.

    The live reads state that "the Outsurance Pointsmen are here to save the day" and that these "heroes in green and purple have been easing traffic congestion for the past 20 years."

    Each variant closes with the identical core message: that the Outsurance Pointsmen help road users "get where we need to be, quickly and safely," framed as "another way you always get something out."It also contains a social media call to action using the hashtag "#PointsmenLove".

    However, the Outsurance Pointsmen have not been permitted to operate within the City of Cape Town metropolitan area for a period exceeding 10 years, and that no such service is, in fact, provided to motorists there.

    The Complainant further noted that, given the frequency and volume of the broadcasts, the representation that the service is available in the City of Cape Town is repeated to listeners on a continual, daily basis.

    The Complainant also states that he previously attempted to raise this concern directly with the radio station's management, and that his attempts to do so went unanswered.

    The Advertiser

    In response, the Advertiser states that the Outsurance Pointsmen project was established in 2005 by Traffic FreeFlow in partnership with Outsurance, and therefore the Pointsmen "have been easing traffic congestion for the past 20 years", and this is a factual reference to this history, rather than a representation as to any specific area of operation.

    The Advertiser confirms that the Pointsmen service is not presently provided within the City of Cape Town itself, and that its presence in the Western Cape is limited to the municipalities of Paarl and Stellenbosch.

    But the Advertiser submits that the advertisement does not represent that the service is available in Cape Town, or in any specific jurisdiction, and that the broadcast reach of CapeTalk Radio Station extends beyond the municipalities in which the Pointsmen service is provided, in a manner it submits is comparable to its radio advertising of the Pointsmen service through partner stations in Gauteng.

    The Advertiser further submits that the advertisement must be assessed from the viewpoint of the hypothetical reasonable person, who is neither oversensitive nor overcritical, and would not be misled into believing that the service is available throughout the entire broadcast reach of the radio station.

    Previous ruling

    The Advertiser relies, in this regard, on a previous ARB ruling in File 4451 (Life Hair Clinic) concerning broad or generic advertising statements and further contends that the Complainant's own submission is internally inconsistent, in that the Complainant accepts that infrequent broadcasting of the advertisement would not be objectionable while contending that frequent broadcasting of the same representation renders it dishonest.

    On these grounds, the Advertiser requests that the complaint be dismissed.

    Application of the Code of Advertising Practice

    The following clauses were considered in this matter:

    • Clause 2 of Section II – Honesty
    • Clause 4.2.1 of Section II – Misleading claims

    The decision

    Having considered all the material before it, the Directorate of the ARB issues the following finding:

    • The claim that the Pointsmen "have been easing traffic congestion for the past 20 years," is not in dispute as a historical statement, and, indeed, the advertisement does not, on its face, name Cape Town or claim coverage of any specific municipality.

    • The overall impression created by an advertisement is, however, assessed with reference to more than its literal wording, and extends to the context in which it is broadcast as well as how a normal, reasonable person would interpret it. CapeTalk is a radio station whose principal identity and primary listenership are closely associated with the City of Cape Town Metropolitan Area, and the advertisement, directed at that listenership, contains no qualification indicating that the service it describes is largely unavailable in the area from which the broadcast draws its audience.

    • Language inviting listeners to feel personally assisted by the Pointsmen, without any geographic qualifier, is capable of creating the impression, in the mind of the ordinary listener located in the Cape Town Metropolitan Area, that the service extends to their own experience of traffic congestion.

    It is the Directorate’s assessment that the Advertiser should have reasonably foreseen that airing the advertising in the geographical context of the Cape Town Metropolitan Area, the principal audience of the radio station, would result in it being factually misleading.

    The Advertiser's comparison to its Gauteng radio partnerships does not assist it on this point. The question is whether, in respect of this advertisement and the geographical context of its broadcast, the complete absence of any geographic qualification is likely to mislead the ordinary listener within the area principally reached.

    The Directorate found that the advertisement contravenes Clause 4.2.1 of Section II of the Code, in that it is, by omission, likely to mislead consumers within the City of Cape Town Metropolitan Area as to the availability of the Outsurance Pointsmen service in that locality.

    About Danette Breitenbach

    Danette Breitenbach is a marketing & media editor at Bizcommunity.com. Previously she freelanced in the marketing and media sector, including for Bizcommunity. She was editor and publisher of AdVantage, the publication that served the marketing, media and advertising industry in southern Africa. She has worked extensively in print media, mainly B2B. She has a Masters in Financial Journalism from Wits.
    More news
    Let's do Biz