How to decide on a recovery site for your contact centre
"Contact centres are complex institutions and many dimensions need to be considered when deciding on a recovery site," said Steven King, business development manager of ContinuitySA, supplier of business continuity management services.
"Based on our years of experience in providing this service to blue-chip clients across the continent, we believe that the following issues need to be considered when making a decision"
The contact centre recovery site needs to have the same level of technology as the production site and it needs to be highly flexible in how it provides that infrastructure. Companies that are taking care of their own recovery site may find this a challenge, particularly as they would typically use production staff to maintain it - thus spreading scarce resources even thinner. If the recovery centre is operated by a third party, it should be on infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) model. Not only does this remove the expenses from the capital to the operational expenses budget, it also effectively shifts the responsibility to the service provider.
Using IaaS also means that the infrastructure can be scaled up and down, something that can be vital during a recovery. "When an organisation invokes a disruption it will typically move around one-third of its contact centre workforce onto the recovery site, and may only provide for a corresponding proportion of normal voice and data traffic. However, it is usually the case that for the first few days after a disaster there is a significant spike in calls," said King. "Under an IaaS model, the provider could scale up capacity, such as the bandwidth required, for that period."
A related question is whether the building is serviced by multiple telecommunications providers. A contact centre is only as good as its links to the outside world and being restricted to one supplier is not acceptable, from the cost and redundancy points of view.