So, if the intention of the hearings is, as claimed, to listen to public opinion on revisions to the Press Code, the complaints procedure to the Press Ombudsman and the constitution of the council, then one basic requirement is advertise the hearings more effectively.
Secondly, apart from the issue of publicising the hearings, is that of how members of the public can lay complaints against journalists and/or publications. At the moment it seems that doing so is not for the faint-hearted - and nor for anyone who is offended by a news report or whatever. This is because in terms of the Press Council's complaints procedure and their definition of a complainant, an individual who wishes to lodge a complaint cannot do so - unless they are personally implicated by the press story in question.
Procedures and definitions are very different in New Zealand and Germany, for example - where 'the little man' can have a complaint relating to a published item heard - even when that individual is not personally aggrieved.
Continue reading the full article on www.FreeAfricanMedia.com, a Daily Maverick initiative.
Free African Media is an initiative of The Daily Maverick team, in collaboration with journalists from all over Africa. With free, quality media and freedom of expression under attack from just about every corner of African reality, it's become more and more obvious that a concentrated, Africa-wide effort is needed to help the fight, and Free African Media aims to do just that. It will function as a platform dedicated to freedom of expression throughout the continent, as well to helping improve the overall quality of reporting, analysis and opinion Africa-wide. Like Free African Media on Facebook; follow on Twitter at @africanmedia and, to contribute, email moc.aidemnacirfaeerf@krow.
Go to: http://www.freeafricanmedia.com
