Key ConCourt ruling clarifies motor sector provident fund calculations

Image source: Dmitry Kalinovsky – 123RF.com

The judgment resolves a central dispute regarding whether contributions under the Motor Industry Bargaining Council (Mibco) should be calculated based on actual hours worked or on the deemed 45-hour work week outlined in Mibco’s Main Collective Agreement.

The court rejected the employer's argument that contributions should be determined solely by actual hours worked.

Instead, it ruled in favor of Mibco’s interpretation, finding that the Provident Fund Collective Agreement must be read together with the Main Collective Agreement. Consequently, contributions for affected temporary employees must be calculated using the standard 45-hour work week.

Employers can't sidestep employee fund contributions despite business transfer

Mzwakhe Poswa  4 Sep 2025

In its decision, the court emphasised that collective agreements must be interpreted in their broader regulatory context rather than in isolation. Bargaining council agreements, the court noted, must align with the objectives of the Labour Relations Act, which includes maintaining orderly collective bargaining and labor stability.

The ruling establishes a legal precedent for how bargaining council frameworks and retirement fund obligations are interpreted across the sector.