Top stories



Marketing & MediaUnilever granted extension to change Sunlight Platinum packaging
Karabo Ledwaba 9 hours


Marketing & MediaThe Philipstown WireCar Grand Prix: Creating sound from wire, scrap metal and found materials
9 hours

More news










A funding rejection does not necessarily mean that a business is failing. Funding decisions are generally based on how a funder assesses the risks associated with the business, its cash flow and the specific opportunity being financed.
For SMME owners trying to understand why an application has fallen short, several recurring questions can help explain how funding decisions are made.
A trading history is important, but it is only one part of a funding assessment. Funders also consider whether a business can continue meeting its financial obligations if circumstances change.
Potential risk signals include cash-flow volatility, heavy reliance on a small number of customers, persistent overdraft use, high fixed costs, narrow margins or limited capacity to absorb late payments.
This is why bank statements form an important part of many funding applications. They show how money moves through the business over time. Alongside contracts, invoices and financial records, they help a funder assess whether the business is trading sustainably and can afford to repay the funding.
Each tells a funder something different. Turnover shows the value of sales, profit shows what remains after costs, and cash flow shows whether the business has enough money to meet expenses and repayments.
This distinction is particularly important for businesses supplying corporates or government entities on extended payment terms. A contract may be profitable, but the business can still run short of cash while waiting 30, 60 or 90 days for payment.
Funders therefore look at how consistently money comes in, regular expenses and debt repayments, and whether contracts or invoices are likely to be paid. Strong turnover and margins matter, but a business also needs to demonstrate that it can manage its cash and meet repayments.
For many smaller businesses, the finances of the owner and the business remain closely connected. Personal credit history can therefore form part of a funding assessment, particularly where the business has a limited trading history or financial track record.
It should not, however, be the only consideration. A business that has been trading consistently, has credible contracts and can demonstrate that it can afford the funding presents a different risk profile from one with little or no trading history.
Different funding providers may also take different approaches to assessing applications, particularly when considering the specific opportunity for which finance is being sought.
The cost of alternative funding varies depending on the provider, the type of finance and the risk involved. Comparing different forms of lending on price alone does not necessarily capture their respective value to a business.
Alternative funding can be useful when a business has secured an opportunity but needs capital to deliver it, whether to buy stock, fulfil a contract or manage cash flow while waiting for payment. Some funding structures can also align repayment with when the business receives payment.
The question, therefore, is not simply whether alternative funding costs more, but whether the opportunity being financed generates sufficient value to justify the cost of capital.
An initial approval may be subject to the funder verifying financial information, contracts, suppliers, customer payment history or other details of the transaction.
If those checks reveal risks that were not clear at the outset, the amount offered, cost or repayment terms may change.
Providing complete and accurate information from the beginning can reduce the likelihood of surprises later. Business owners should also establish which conditions still need to be met and what factors could affect the final offer.
While funding models differ, funders generally want to establish whether a business can deliver on the opportunity being financed, continue operating if a customer pays late or costs increase, and manage the financial implications of taking on debt or other forms of funding.
That means being able to provide clear financial records, credible contracts or invoices and realistic cash-flow forecasts. It also means understanding the margins on the work being funded, what it will cost to deliver and how the funding will be repaid.
Understanding how funders make their decisions cannot guarantee approval, but it can help SMMEs approach funding discussions better prepared.
For businesses with viable opportunities but limited access to traditional credit, alternative finance can provide another route to capital. The key consideration for any business owner is to understand the cost, repayment obligations and risks attached to the funding, and whether the capital will generate enough value to justify taking it on.