Marketing opinion

Subscribe to industry newsletters

Press offices

Enquire about a press office
Bizcommunity has over 400 industry contributors and we always welcome further contributions and contributors.
Advertise with us
Advertise & RatesMy Account
Company press officeList company
Recruitment packagesSubmit job ad
Download ratecard

Marketing opinion

Why agencies don't advertise themselves

In a recent article on Bizcommunity, PR pundit Peter Mann asks the pertinent question "Why Don't Agencies Advertise?"
In view of my 35+ years experience as a copywriter in the wonderful, wild, whacky world of advertising, I think I am eminently qualified to answer this question.

Agencies don't advertise because they don't know what they're doing, or what the purpose of advertising really is, or even the most basic rudiments of our craft.

In the first decade of the 20th century a Canadian Mounty-turned-copywriter by name of John E. Kennedy coined the expression "advertising is salesmanship in print." 100 years down the road and a better definition has yet to be proffered.

Does advertising sell

In front of me is the 2007 edition of Tony Koenderman's Ad Review. In an article headed "Does Advertising Sell? And should it?" the MD of "one of South Africa's most creative agencies" has this to say:

"I genuinely don't believe that advertising sells...when I sit with current and prospective clients I tell them that outright...advertising doesn't - and won't - sell their product."

With attitudes like this it's hardly surprising clients don't take agencies too seriously.

Vast amounts of money are wasted every year on advertising that accomplishes nothing. If many clients treated their capital equipment investments the cavalier way they treat their advertising expenditure they'd probably be out of business in short order.

He's not alone

But I don't think the MD mentioned above is alone in his misguided views. I think it's the prevailing attitude. The result is that agencies, instead of focusing on selling the client's product, they are now focused on winning creative awards because that's all that separates one agency from another these days.

And to say that advertising doesn't sell ignores the vast body of work produced by companies that wouldn't be in business if their advertising didn't produce profitable results.

The debate between award winning vs effectiveness is not new. It's been raging for almost a century and is unlikely to be resolved any time soon.

But creativity in advertising is, in my opinion, becoming a commodity if it isn't already. This year Acme Advertising picks up a slew of gongs, next year Slamdunk Creative Concepts takes the honours. Who really cares?

Who?

Blame can also be apportioned to the advertising schools. When I speak to graduates of these schools and ask them what they know of the history of advertising I'm met with blank stares. They've never heard of people like Albert Lasker, John E. Kennedy, Claude Hopkins, Victor Schwab, Maxwell Sackheim, James Webb Young, John Caples or Rosser Reeves, among others. Yet these are the people who laid the very foundations of what we call advertising today. Not one of them would have dared opine "advertising doesn't sell". On the contrary, another advertising great, David Ogilvy, said "we sell - or else."

Clients are not entirely blameless in this scenario, either. "If more agencies were held accountable for the work they produce, advertising would look very different to the way it does."

We need to know how to sell

But if one doesn't know how to sell, how can one go about the business of actually selling? Teach the kids in school, particularly the copywriting students, how to sell stuff, and we may see a renaissance of the ad agency.

Until agencies can put proven, real results in front of clients they've really got no point of difference to talk about. They've all tried advertising their own services but with little success, I imagine.

In paging through the issue of Tony Koenderman's Ad Review I mentioned earlier, I do see ads for agencies. They are full of platitudes, generalities, and meaningless puffery. And if they don't know how to sell themselves, how can they be expected to sell their clients' products or services?
    
 

About Grahame Hall

Grahame Hall is a copywriter with 35 years experience. In that time he has worked in dozens of agencies, large and small. He abhors the wasteful way most agencies spend their clients' money. It's money which could be put to far better use feeding the poor than winning meaningless awards.
Nick Durrant
While I agree with the article, advertising must have some affect on sales?
Take our buying behaviour for example. Advertising plays a large part in brand building and from there comes the reason why we choose one brand over another. There is the psychology behind reputation, quality, cost and so on that all plays a role in why we buy one product over the other...and therefore that is having a play on "sales".

And yes, there is plenty of wasted money and I cannot believe how irresponsible some marketing folk are with their budgets! That's the agency selling them some wacky idea and them buying it (hook, line and sinker).
Posted on 4 Oct 2012 14:21
John Mann
The problem is its the Sales or Marketing dept that goes and deals with the Agnecy. Send in your" low reaction senior BUYER" of your company and let him/her cut ti off c bomb wenthe deal. After all you are buying the services of an Ad agency. Why send in the Sales Director. We have a buyer who might blink if an atom bomb went off next to him. But he'd sure ride that Ad agency into the ground if he purchased something from them and there was no results to show him after a few weeks. John
Posted on 4 Oct 2012 15:05
John Mann
Sorry some gremlins crept in above.
The problem is it's the Sales or Marketing dept that goes and deals with the Agnecy. Send in your" low reaction senior BUYER" of your company and let him/her cut the deal. After all, you are buying the services of an Ad agency. Why send in the Sales Director. We have a buyer who might blink if an atom bomb went off next to him. But he'd sure ride that Ad agency into the ground if he purchased something from them and there was no results to show him after a few weeks. John
Posted on 4 Oct 2012 15:23
James Gradidge
MAD MEN?

Have we forgotten? Every ad for the client is an ad for the agency. Remember the key line? Ad agencies do advertise, but not to the general public.

If you can achieve a better result with a rifle than a shotgun, then what is possible with a high powered sniper special?

Great advertising sells, without a doubt, I have some sales graphs in my portfolio that starkly contradict my lack of Loeries.

Perhaps it's time for a "Best Sellers" category at your next celebrity bash?
Posted on 10 Oct 2012 12:15
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This Message Board accepts no liability of legal consequences that arise from the Message Boards (e.g. defamation, slander, or other such crimes). All posted messages are the sole property of their respective authors. The maintainer does retain the right to remove any message posts for whatever reasons. People that post messages to this forum are not to libel/slander nor in any other way depict a company, entity, individual(s), or service in a false light; should they do so, the legal consequences are theirs alone. Bizcommunity.com will disclose authors' IP addresses to authorities if compelled to do so by a court of law.

News