PR & Communications opinion

Subscribe to industry newsletters

Press offices

Enquire about a press office
Bizcommunity has over 400 industry contributors and we always welcome further contributions and contributors.
Advertise with us
Advertise & RatesMy Account
Company press officeList company
Recruitment packagesSubmit job ad
Download ratecard

PR & Communications opinion

When retail and politics collide: The Israel/Palestine conundrum

The current Israel/Palestinian conflict has again intensified calls for boycotts, divestment and sanctions (BDS), with supporters urging major retail brands to discontinue the sale of products manufactured in Israel, which affects brand managers of stores such as Woolworths, Pick n Pay and Dischem.
If caught unprepared, even the most well-meaning decision makers are damned if they do and damned if they don't. Heeding the call of pro-Palestinian activists means rejecting Israel and sidelining one's pro-Israeli customer base. The alternative is to continue stocking products showing up on the BDS Campaign's no-go list and again run the risk of making enemies in the process.

With an active Jewish and Muslim community, many South Africans find themselves personally invested in Palestine/Gaza. Furthermore, international community boycotts and sanctions were instrumental in the demise of Apartheid South Africa and because of this, the power of a product boycott tends to yank at our heartstrings just a little more than other nations.

Whether a systematic boycott by Palestinian supporters of a brand such as Woolworths, for example, will negatively affect the company's pockets will ultimately depend on whether these 'consumer activists' value liberating Palestine more than they love their microwave lasagne.

Nevertheless, all publicity is not necessarily good publicity. Retailers currently in the hot seat are experiencing organised protests on their social media platforms resulting in pockets of the Middle East conflict being fought on their Facebook pages - not ideal when you are desperately trying to promote the winter final clearance sale.

These brands are being accused of unethical business practice in much the same way as if they were found to be using child labourers to manufacture their products or were selling blood diamonds, for example. Brand reputation is at risk should they not choose to navigate through these murky political waters wisely.

Reputational PR essential

Most brands hire a PR company or person to increase their position in the market place or to become top of mind when thinking of a certain industry. Very few have a particular reputation issue they need managed and even less consider that the origin of the products they sell could become a reputation issue.

With the continual growth of social media, a conscious consumer has been created. One that wants to know if the food contains GMO or if the soap was tested on animals.

Just as brands should have strategies in place for the ingredient list of a product, they now need to know the origin of that product and its subsequent political affiliation. This requires a proactive contingency plan because ignoring it and hoping it will disappear is certainly not the right approach.
    
 

About Jess Mouneimne

Journalist, blogger and editor, Digital strategist, social media trail blazer and public relations guru. Mother, wife and lover of chocolate, good coffee and Mixed Martial Arts
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This Message Board accepts no liability of legal consequences that arise from the Message Boards (e.g. defamation, slander, or other such crimes). All posted messages are the sole property of their respective authors. The maintainer does retain the right to remove any message posts for whatever reasons. People that post messages to this forum are not to libel/slander nor in any other way depict a company, entity, individual(s), or service in a false light; should they do so, the legal consequences are theirs alone. Bizcommunity.com will disclose authors' IP addresses to authorities if compelled to do so by a court of law.
Given Israel's dominant role in the global diamond industry, the importance of the diamond industry to the Israeli economy (30% of manufacturing exports) and the fact that revenue for the industry generates about $1 billion annually for the Israeli military which stands accused of war crimes by UNHRC, AI and HRW, blood diamonds are a reality for the jewellery industry, one which they are desperately trying to avoid commenting on as they have no defence.
Diamonds that fund a regime guilty of gross human rights violations are blood diamonds.
The fact that the Kimberley Process only applies to rough diamonds leaves a gaping loophole which jewellers use to claim Israeli blood diamonds are conflict-free.
Increasing numbers of people worldwide are learning that diamonds from Israel are a major source of funding for the apartheid regime which murders, maims and terrorises with impunity.
In the past few weeks human rights activists have staged protests in London and Dublin calling on jewellers to end the trade in Israeli blood diamonds
Shareholders in companies such as Anglo American, Cartier, Tiffany's, Signet, Chow Tai Fook and others are exposed. Their CEOs and Boards have deceived patrons, shareholders and investors claiming their diamonds are conflict free and have failed to inform shareholders of the risk in a timely manner as they are obliged to do under stock market rules.
Posted on 9 Aug 2014 23:09

News