Submit newsAdvertise & rates  23°C Johannesburg Contact us
Press offices

Printing opinion

Set your camera on high resolution!

13 Mar 2009 10:5718 commentsBizLike
I have frequently had clients who want to use their own photography in an ad or a marketing brochure and it often makes a lot of sense. For example, you might have “before”, “during” and “after” photographs of a major construction. These aren't the kind of photos that you can reconstruct with a professional photographer after the fact. The moment is gone and the beautifully shot “after” photo might be meaningless without the comparison to the “before” photo.
The all-too-frequent problem, however, is that the photos are simply not of an acceptable standard. Now I am not being precious here; I'm not talking artistic standards or photographic composition. I'm not even talking lighting. The issue is resolution.

Almost too good to be true

Digital cameras have made instant photography accessible to almost everyone. And the speed and convenience of being able to email a photograph to your ad agency and have them use it in your brochure; giving you exactly the pic you want, with no expensive photography, sounds almost too good to be true.

Sadly, all too often it is. And the client is left with the sneaking suspicion that the agency is being unhelpful and simply wants to use a professional photographer for no reason other than ego or the markup they charge on photography.

But this doesn't have to be an issue. The problem is very easily solved. All you need to do is set your camera on high resolution. It is ironic that, while even entry-level digital cameras offer more megapixels than you are ever likely to need, this technology is not being put to good use. Instead, users are setting their cameras on low resolution, giving them photographs that are unsuitable for litho printing.

The reality is that a photograph might look perfect on your computer screen. It might even look fine printed out on your laser or inkjet printer. But that doesn't mean you can use it in a newspaper or a magazine. A combination of size of the photograph, and the resolution at which the camera is set determines where and how you can use that photo.

Brand image compromised

The consequences of using a photo at low resolution is that, in print, your picture will lose definition and clarity. It will become blurry and rough around the edges, and you might even see little squares of colour instead of a smooth transition from one shade to the next, where pixilation is severe. Basically, the quality of the ad, the communication and the image of the brand are compromised.

There are people who will tell you that they can transform a 70dpi photo into a 300dpi photo. But while the numbers can be converted, you cannot add in resolution. It is as simple as that. Alternatively, however, you can take a large size, high resolution photo and convert it to small size for easy emailing and use on websites.

In fact, the software to convert high res to low res is probably already installed on your computer. And it certainly is more courteous (and self-serving) to email low res pics to online publications - no-one wants their bandwidth eaten up by high res pics they don't need and certainly won't look kindly on you (or your PR article) if you clog up their system! [Couldn't have said it better myself! - Assistant Editor]

But as long as you start off with a high res photo, you will be able to convert it and use it for litho print and online.

Memory card too small?

So why don't people take photos on high res? Perhaps because they leave their camera as it was set when they bought it because they don't know how to change it. It might be because they like to email their photos and the high res ones are too slow or use up their bandwidth. Or perhaps the memory card that came with the camera is so small that if they set their camera on high res they can only fit two or three photos on the card.

The answer is to buy a practical memory card. 1GB cards are very reasonably priced and will give you enough memory for most of your needs. You can leave your camera set on high resolution and be confident that you will be able to use your photographs for advertising and promotional material, and the only debate will be the aesthetics of the photograph.

If you are in a technical environment where employees are asked to take photographs of projects with their own cameras, I would suggest that you allow them to claim the cost of a good memory card. The cost is negligible in comparison with the lost opportunity cost when you have a great PR story, only to discover that the publications won't accept your article because the quality of the photograph is unsuitable.

Oh and by the way, that lovely photo you copied from your website? No, that won't work in print media either!
 
More options

About Ann Druce

Ann Druce spent 15 years on the client side of the business, marketing major FMCG brands for big name companies, including Unilever and Adcock Ingram, before moving to the other side of the desk and joining an ad agency. Today she heads up Octarine Communications www.octarine.co.za, an advertising and design agency based in Durban, with national clients in the industrial, professional and consumer sectors. Contact Ann on tel (0)31 564 6921 or email . Read the Octarine blog at http://octarineopinions.blogspot.com.View MyBiz profile and articles...
myphotographer
I agree, the amount of times I have had to explain to...-
a client that a thumbnail jpeg of 25k just will not print well in a magazine which is 300dpi is amazing.

But with mobile technology and people very fast becoming aware of how much "space/memory" they have left for music and pics I don't see this being a problem in the next two years.

These days, no one should have anything less than a 1gig memory card as most decent camera's compact or dslr are 8mp and above and shooting on high res jpeg will probably give about +- 230 pics.

Nice article, useful information, thanks for sharing. Posted on 13 Mar 2009 12:22
Media Owner
HOORAY!-
At last! If only PR companies would understand how many times their stories are rejected because of poor photography ....
The local music industry is a case in point.
'Yes - we have amazing visuals of the band - it will make a wonderful poster!'

The pic arrives and would blow out at an A5 size.
Take heed PR people. Posted on 13 Mar 2009 14:27
Trevor Fish
The bottom line USE A PROFESSIONAL-
As a photographer I am angered to read an article like this.
I dont tell Pr or corperate clients how to write an article or media release so sinse when is everybody in the communications industry a photographer.
The reason a lot of press releases dont get used in not only the technical quality of a photograph but also the way the photograph is taken and the fact that the photgraphph does not tell the story.Thats what photographs are for.
If you pay a professional photographer a realistic fee to do a job the results will talk for themselves.
Owning a 1 gig card, a point and squirt camera and having taken photographps of yor children, your last holiday or your friends cousins 21st does not automatically make a professional photographer out of a Pr or marketing assistant or the like.
We all tell our clients how professional we are and how we will deliver a professional job for them but when it comes to photography we use the gal in HR because she has a camera and can take photographs.
When the media wont use the pics you wonder why, you curse the editor and blame everybody for the fact that your release or photographs are not being used, when in fact they are not usable
This is a senario which I have come across over and over , it is not unusual.
How professional is that?
Please use a professional photographer for a professional job Posted on 13 Mar 2009 16:08
George
Great Article and lesson-
Thanks Ann for a great article. It taught me a few important things to keep in mind. As a newbie in internet marketing your article is gold in print Posted on 13 Mar 2009 16:20
Christoph Heierli
Pixel 101-
Thank you for putting the pixel debate in a nutshell for the regular person out there who has a new shiny digital point and shoot and has ambitions of becoming a professional photographer.

For those of us that have made the transition from analogue to digital in the professional environment in the beginning, have made a huge investment of time and money to grasp this new technology which is constantly improving. Understanding the pixel also requires photographers to grasp digital related software.
There is a lot of technical stuff to know about the digital era, and it shows if you see quality. Unfortunately there is a lot of poor quality out there for many reasons, financial being the biggest which has brought down the general standard in the media and the perception is that anyone can do it.
Many have burnt their fingers and I am sure many good products have had false starts and never seen the light of day because poor quality images were used.

There is also something called "post production" which I call the how-did-they-do-that factor and most professional photographers make use of these services. Good Post Production is normally the interface between photographer, special FX and getting the image "print ready"

My advise to those who want to stand out from the humdrum is to make the investment in good professional digital photography. It is worth every cent and it shows! Posted on 13 Mar 2009 21:17
WRONG ADVICE!!!!-
Unfortunately the writer doesn't seems understand resolution at all. In addiditon she appears oblivious of the fact that you cannot use this type of photography successfully for a format of anything larger than 14Mb (A5 and upwards). If you want professional photography - hire a professional. Unless you are a pro photographer don't be fooled that cheap solutions can replace the real deal. Posted on 14 Mar 2009 00:15
relebohile
and dont forget that on camera flash gives great results-
so much better than any professional photographer could do. all that money spent on studying photography just to learn now that i could have done pr or marketing and gotten all the info i need on bizcommunity. someone should warn the photoschools that theyre all wasting all that technical information that they teach students they should go into the business of selling point and shoot cameras and have specials on the ones a set that includes setting the camera on on hires and selling it with 1gb memory card!
thank you so much for this. now i can trade all my equipement in and buy a point and shoot camera and a 1gb card! perhaps i'll get more jobs with that.

and i wont have to spend any money on courses upgrading my knowledge on digital photography or anything like that anymore! oh joy!

what a simplistic attitude! Posted on 15 Mar 2009 18:42
Barking Dog
Slippery Slope-
While we're at it, why don't we let the client write the copy too? And do the art direction? Hell, we should just let the client do the strategy, the concept and the entire ad.

Oh, hang on. We do. Posted on 16 Mar 2009 09:11
hmmm
Terrible...-
I heard somewhere that they got someone with a 8 megapixel camera to shoot the latest Harvey Nicols campaign.

oh wait.

They didn't.

Great brands understand the elements that are needed to to make great advertising. There is a reason why we have photographers. Posted on 16 Mar 2009 15:18
sandy
Photography and quality-
If you want quality, then employ a formally trained, experienced photographer who will know the difference between high and low resolution. Simple. Posted on 16 Mar 2009 20:57
Pro Photographer
USE A PRO!!!!-
Here we go again..

ANOTHER know-it-all who thinks that cost cutting means bypassing the professional photographer and suggesting clients do it themselves.
A badly taken image can NEVER be corrected afterwards in post production! Articles like this DO NOT do our industry any good.

Pro Photographer Posted on 16 Mar 2009 21:07
Another Pro Photographer
Dpi-
And one day when you are grown up let me axplain how Dpi works Posted on 17 Mar 2009 10:22
Get real-
Really, I can’t believe how snotty some people are - all the author was trying to do was offer advice to those who DO WANT to take their OWN photos (for whatever reason) - she is not dismissing pro photographers. Get a life! I think she explained it quite well, especially considering that those who are taking their own photos and making a mess of it are unlikely to understand or relate to a more complex and in-depth explanation. It is quite obvious that a professional photographer is first prize but in the real world it is not always an option - especially for smaller concerns. Posted on 17 Mar 2009 12:40
lightmonkey
Lightmonkey...-
I saw this article as a way to improve one's photography if you will be taking your own photos and not as a guide to avoid hiring a professional photographer?

Ignore the comments from the peanut gallery that say otherwise.

R Posted on 17 Mar 2009 12:58
Stills
Professional photography-
If you want to see the difference between owning a 12 meg camera and being an experienced professional photographer look on the following web site:

http://www.profotoawards.co.za.

The Annual Awards ceremony will be held on Thursday evening(19th March 2009) Posted on 17 Mar 2009 13:01
Simone Puterman: editor-at-large
Thanks for all the comments-
If any professional photographers out there would like to write an opinion piece or two to help educate Bizcommunity.com readers, please email contributors@bizcommunity.com. Posted on 17 Mar 2009 17:05
Thulani Hlophe
Excellent Ideas-
I am a photographer.
Firstly, I would to say thank you very much with this informative article and let's hope that other Photographers and Clients out there would take take their time and read this article. We are learning everyday

Thanks a lot !!!!!!

Thulani Hlophe Posted on 18 Mar 2009 10:44
NOT against pro photographers-
I didn't see this article "against pro photographers" at all.

Quite frankly, I regularly receive low quality, out of focus, badly lit, poor backgrounds, at a resolution of 72dpi digital photos that I am FORCED to use in client's newsletters and magazines by the clients themselves because "sorry, that's all we have of that function, person, building, etc". And these are not Mickey Mouse companies by any means. They were never going to use a professional for most of these events and snapshots and probably will never use one for them.

And none of this is lack of trying on my part to explain to client about digital photos and the dpi and quality required for print! It is so frustrating! Posted on 24 Mar 2009 08:52
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This Message Board accepts no liability of legal consequences that arise from the Message Boards (e.g. defamation, slander, or other such crimes). All posted messages are the sole property of their respective authors. The maintainer does retain the right to remove any message posts for whatever reasons. People that post messages to this forum are not to libel/slander nor in any other way depict a company, entity, individual(s), or service in a false light; should they do so, the legal consequences are theirs alone. Bizcommunity.com will disclose authors' IP addresses to authorities if compelled to do so by a court of law.

Subscribe to industry newsletters

Bizcommunity has over 400 industry contributors and we always welcome further contributions and contributors.

Subscribe

Receive free email newsletter

Make us your homepageAdd us to your favoritesRSS feedGet biz on your phoneFollow us

Invite

Tell a friend about us