You have to hand it to e.tv. It's the best news channel in the country by a mile and its always enthusiastically looking for great news angles. But, I really wish it would stop coming up with knee-jerk, pseudo research projects because these are dangerously misleading.
Last year, for example, it started having SMS "Yes or No" opinion polls during news bulletins that produced very skewed and inaccurate results and earned e.tv the scorn and derision of the marketing community.
A bit silly really
Now, it's come up with something equally silly. It's certainly had the right idea to start a regular feature during news broadcasts of monitoring food prices during what is now officially a recession in this country. Good for e.tv and well done. It's about time someone did something like that.
Trouble is it is doing it all wrong. For a start, it decided to choose a "basket" of basic groceries and said that it would be checking on the prices of that particular basket regularly in the same three supermarkets. Superspar, Pick n Pay and I believe the third was Checkers.
Supermarkets are not stupid
Now, any of those three supermarkets who happen to be even vaguely awake will immediately give the instruction that the prices of those few products, which e.tv mentioned by name, be immediately frozen if not reduced.
Which will mean that after six months there will be no prices increase and all e.tv will be doing is suggesting that food prices have not increased one bit.
Alternatively, if it intends using different products every week, then that also presents a problem because all that will be doing is comparing prices between supermarkets which actually isn't going to prove anything in the long run. Particularly as most supermarkets have quite a few special offers or "loss leaders" that will certainly skew results.
Ask the experts
e.tv should really have a chat to someone in the market research industry - it would probably get the advice for free, I would imagine.
In my opinion the only way to do this accurately is to have a basket of groceries, but to keep what is in the basket a secret. That way, no supermarket will know what is being priced and won't be able to pre-empt the results by reducing prices.
Another big danger
Something else e.tv should be careful of is creating false impressions by doing knee-jerk research like this. Given that all three supermarkets are advertisers on e.tv, the last things e.tv needs are growing perceptions that the whole exercise is not so much protecting the consumer as doing some nice PR for its clients.
Which is exactly what will happen if the supermarkets hold down prices of that e.tv basket of products and food prices aren't seen to be going up as much as they are perceived to be doing. e.tv is on very dangerous ground.
Chris Moerdyk was head of strategic planning and public affairs for BMW South Africa and spent 16 years in the creative and client service departments of ad agencies, ending up as resident director of Lindsay Smithers-FCB in KwaZulu-Natal. Chris was recently listed in a Markinor survey as one of South Africa's top 10 marketing thought leaders. Apart from currently being a corporate marketing analyst, advisor and media commentator, he is non-executive chairman of Bizcommunity. Email Chris on and follow him on Twitter at @chrismoerdyk.
If it means that the three supermarkets will freeze or reduce the price of those items, maybe that should be the point - so that the prices DO remain the same or go down. Perhaps ETV should use it as an opportunity to choose stable foods like bread and milk - that way they'll be doing their civil duty by ensuring affordability of key items in these very pocket-abusing recessionary times.
Just my two cents worth. Posted on 28 May 2009 14:03
I beg to differ on your opening statement Chris. In my humble opinion eTV news is hardly the best that there is.The eTV news depratment tends to come across as desperate wanna bes to the point that it shows so glaringly.Its great to chase the story & the "truth", whatever that means but to do it in such an ashamedly anti-establishment manner is a bit childish and plain petulant! We all want politicians to account for the decisions they make on behalf of their constituency but when journalists at times approach some our our political leaders, it leaves a sour taste in my mouth.A case in point would be the Deborah Patta bulldogishly "attacking" the intellectually astute Pallo Jordan about on the Dalai Lama debacle,she bordered on embarassing if somewhat hell bent on getting an angle on the story which she had pre-decided on but he is way above her intellectually and he never relented and she just ended up looking like a demented, blood thirsty journalist.I must say it was one my most uncomfortable news moments of earlier on this year and I just wanted to hide for her sake. That is just one example that springs to mind but there are plenty when at times I've felt as a South African, not sure what the point of the story was. Was it to embarass and ridicule or to get to the real issues. So I disagree my jury is still out on who is doing a better job between the 2 on fair news coverage in SA but I'm more inclined to err on the side of the troubled SABC. eTV news department has the potential but it needs to get a grip on itself before it self destructs. But then again if their strategy is to be anti-establishment at all costs, even at times alienating and insulting he same people that they are bringing the "truth" to, then they are doing a fantastic job. Posted on 28 May 2009 16:35
They also conpared PnP no name & checkers no name to Spar brand products. They should have compared them to the Spar Savemor range, which is equal to PnP's no name. The Spar brand would be equal to PnP Choice, for example. If they want to do a proper comparison, they should compare the cost of Allgold at all the stores...because ultimately with the house brands you are paying a premium for quality. Fact. This is extremely unethical and misleading of ETV & they should be careful of the false claims they make. Posted on 29 May 2009 08:36
"It's the best news channel in the country by a mile and its always enthusiastically looking for great news angles." Is this true, really? The 7pm news seem to be an exact duplicate of the 10pm news. And on their newly launched dstv channel, there seems to be more duplications and a huge lack of reporting on international affairs. The free to air channel is a step ahead of other channels in the country... not necessarily by a mile, but the angle has always remained the same. Great news angles would imply that they have great "content" i.e. news! Childish research games is in fact what a bad news channel does... gimmicks, it's what their good at. Posted on 29 May 2009 08:49
It's embarrassing and degrades the profession. If e.tv wants to lure a bigger audience, they should really think of consulting experts in the market research industry.
Change is good. And they have not opened any room for change or improvement in news coverage. Deborah's 'style' is out of fashion. They must please try something new soon. Posted on 29 May 2009 08:53
After the news story broke Superspar did the price comparison using its Savemor brand(comparative to Pick n Pay No name) and their basket came out to be about R175. E.TV chose to go to a low LSM Pick n Pay and Checkers and they went to a high LSM (LSM 9/10) Superspar. Stores on those categories do not stock your lower LSM No name brands as it does not form part of their customers basket. If E.TV decides to do this again let us hope they compare apples with apples that time. Posted on 29 May 2009 09:28
What really got me about E TV’s inflation testing “basket” was the bag of oranges. As most South Africans know, oranges are seasonal. This means that locally produced oranges are simply not available all year round – in which case supermarkets sell imported oranges. These imported ones cost around R7-R12 a kilo, compared to local oranges which retail for around R1.40 (or less) per kg. Hence an imported 7 kg bag of oranges will set you back R49 in February, but a locally grown 7 kg bag will cost you R9.80 in May. That’s an 80% decrease in the space of 3 months. Posted on 31 May 2009 01:53
Yes, there are better ways of achieving the goals that you ascribe to etv. It doesn't necessarily follow that, by consulting with a researcher you will necessarily not be doing childish research. For example, in my four years of doing online panel market research, the biggest objection from the marketing research community (and clients) that it we come across is that 'panellists are not representative'. Aw come on - people who are prepared to give up 30 minutes to 2 hours to be interviewed by a stranger about the ecomonic behaviour are representative? So Father Christmas delivers presents with a sleigh as well? Posted on 17 Jun 2009 09:13
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This Message Board accepts no liability of legal consequences that arise from the Message Boards (e.g. libel, slander, or other such crimes). All posted messages are the sole property of their respective authors. The maintainer does retain the right to remove any message posts for whatever reasons. People that post messages to this forum are not to libel/slander nor in any other way depict a company, entity, individual(s), or service in a false light; should they do so, the legal consequences are theirs alone. Bizcommunity.com will disclose authors' IP addresses to authorities if compelled to do so by a court of law.