Facebook amended its terms of use a couple weeks ago and the changes have profound implications for its users, including its business users, none of them positive. So what is all the fuss about? When you post content to Facebook, you grant it a broad licence to not only manipulate your content but also the right to make commercial use of that content. [audio]
This is a concern to users who use Facebook as a personal social network but the kicker is how it affects businesses.
So why would a business use Facebook?
Most marketing people will tell you that Facebook offers businesses the opportunity to promote their products, services and brands to their fans using services such as Facebook Pages and Facebook Ads. They can tell you about how ads can be targeted at very specific groups of users and how a Facebook Page gives fans an opportunity to engage with the business and its brand in a variety of ways. There is little doubt that Facebook has a lot to offer businesses, as well as individual users, and it can open many doors. The catch is what you have to give away in the process.
Terms of use
Virtually every major online service includes a licence in its terms of use which you grant to that company. The licences are typically pretty broad and contain language along the lines of “perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive licence to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through...”
For the most part, these licences are in place to enable the company to manipulate your content and continue to provide its service to its users. In other words, the licences enable companies such as YouTube and Flickr to take your content and display it to other users and otherwise allow them to do all the things they do with that content.
The licence Facebook takes from its users goes much further than simply enabling Facebook to provide its service to them.
For starters, you need to take a closer look at how Facebook defines key terms such as “User Content” and “Post” because these terms don't mean quite what you think they do. What is noteworthy about them is that they include content which users may link to from Facebook as well as “anything else that you Post on or through the Facebook Service”.
First problem
“Post” includes linking and sharing and here is the first problem. Often users may link to or share content outside Facebook and which they may either have licensed (or not) under a specific licence or the content belongs to someone else and the user just wants share it with friends. Facebook doesn't draw a distinction between these categories of content and this is a problem.
When you read the licence itself, you begin to appreciate just how objectionable the terms of use are.
The licence includes similar wording to the typical wording quoted above and then it goes on to not only license “User Content” you post but also any content you enable another user to “Post” (this includes “User Content” you may have published elsewhere and which a user may link to or share in his or her profile).
The licence even goes so far as to permit Facebook to use “your name, likeness and image for any purpose, including commercial or advertising”. The licence ignores any existing licenses which may apply to your content which falls into this overly broad net.
Consider carefully
Businesses should carefully consider what “User Content” they “Post”. Their multimedia on their Facebook Page is in Facebook's hands, as is the content businesses may encourage their fans to share on their Page. What makes matters worse is that the licence persists despite a Page being taken down or a profile terminated. Once you fall into Facebook's net, you can never fully extricate yourself and your “User Content” endures on Facebook long after you are gone.
Listen to Paul Jacobson's brief commentary of some of the provisions of Facebook's terms of use.
Paul Jacobson is a web and digital media lawyer working in Johannesburg and is the principal attorney and founder of the new media law firm, Jacobson Attorneys (http://webtechlaw.com). Paul speaks at universities and conferences about new media and the law and writes about these issues (and others) on his firm's website. Follow him at http://paul.myplaxo.com or http://friendfeed.com/pauljacobson.
Facebook can get away with this because we all agreed to its terms of use. While it is definitely cause for concern, the risks are manageable to a degree although this is one of those times when a lawyer is a good idea, unfortunately.
It is also important not to lose sight of the reasons why using Facebook is beneficial. You just need to factor in the risks. Posted on 17 Feb 2009 21:51
In web2.0 there are people who have tremendous problems with privacy, as if there is an alternative. The entire social model depends on freedom of media and the distribution of it.
It is after all, a 'social platform'. From my perspective it seems to be expected that if you DONT want to share information then DONT make it available on a social platform.
However if someone uses something that is not their own and posts it on Facebook and YouTube, that is a completely different can of worms. Posted on 18 Feb 2009 00:00
There has been a lot of discussion on this on the net, none of it really positive to facebook.
The owners of facebook say not to worry as they have no intention of abusing it, which may well be true. But should you trust? Posted on 18 Feb 2009 07:20
From what u wrote,this is what i can tell.The people in charge of facebook think that they have arrived,with so much people using facebook they know they can rely on a certain level of dependency.personaly and for my growing business i just think its plain STUPID. Posted on 18 Feb 2009 08:59
Terms of Use Update - as seen on FB today (18 Feb 09)-
"A couple of weeks ago, we posted an update to our Terms of Use that we hoped would clarify some parts of it for our users. Over the past couple of days, we have received a lot of questions and comments about these updated terms and what they mean for people and their information. Because of the feedback we received, we have decided to return to our previous Terms of Use while we resolve the issues that people have raised." Posted on 18 Feb 2009 09:14
Over the past few days, we have received a lot of feedback about the new terms we posted two weeks ago. Because of this response, we have decided to return to our previous Terms of Use while we resolve the issues that people have raised.
If you want to share your thoughts on what should be in the new terms, check out our group Facebook Bill of Rights and Responsibilities. Posted on 18 Feb 2009 10:25
Facebook have reverted back to their previous terms and conditions-
If you log on to Facebook today you will see the notice:
Terms of Use UpdateClose Over the past few days, we have received a lot of feedback about the new terms we posted two weeks ago. Because of this response, we have decided to return to our previous Terms of Use while we resolve the issues that people have raised. Posted on 18 Feb 2009 10:43
They should actually go back to the old TOS, as if they automatically own stuff you post, you can post illegal software on there and they would be held liable for owning stolen or illegal content.
A bunch of pigs I say... If I knew they would change the TOS like this I wouldnt have signed up. Posted on 22 Feb 2009 17:33
In response to widespread user backlash, Facebook decided to revert to its old terms while it formulates new terms on the 18th. Mark Zuckerberg said:
"A couple of weeks ago, we posted an update to our Terms of Use that we hoped would clarify some parts of it for our users. Over the past couple of days, we have received a lot of questions and comments about these updated terms and what they mean for people and their information. Because of the feedback we received, we have decided to return to our previous Terms of Use while we resolve the issues that people have raised."
But anyway I suggest you all read Kara Swisher's Column "You have no privacy anyway. Get over it"
http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090216/you-have-zero-privacy-anyway-get-over-it-that-goes-double-on-social-networks/ Posted on 23 Feb 2009 14:39
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This Message Board accepts no liability of legal consequences that arise from the Message Boards (e.g. libel, slander, or other such crimes). All posted messages are the sole property of their respective authors. The maintainer does retain the right to remove any message posts for whatever reasons. People that post messages to this forum are not to libel/slander nor in any other way depict a company, entity, individual(s), or service in a false light; should they do so, the legal consequences are theirs alone. Bizcommunity.com will disclose authors' IP addresses to authorities if compelled to do so by a court of law.