The SABC cannot be everything to everyone; it is time to be pragmatic and businesslike, get the organisation back into profitability and allow it to rebuild itself - and only then look at what may be possible.
When now-deposed SABC chair, Kanyi Mkonza was appointed by President Mbeki just after Polokwane, I asked her if she knew what a "hospital pass" was.
She had never heard of the expression, which essentially comes from the game of rugby when a team-mate passes the ball to you split seconds before you get crash-tackled into oblivion by the opposition defenders.
I reckon Kanyi Mkonza now knows first hand exactly what a hospital pass is all about.
Think about it. Mbeki had just lost out at Polokwane and between then and when he was forced to step down as president, he tossed in a few last-minute presidential decisions, one of which was to appoint Mkonza as SABC chair of a new board he had approved after recommendations from the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Communications.
Within weeks that same portfolio committee publicly announced it had lost confidence in the very board it had selected only a few months earlier.
Double trouble
Then started a chain of events that would have made a riveting soap opera for TV except for the fact that not even the most creative and imaginative script writer could have dreamed up such a convoluted story-line that was so filled with double-dealing, double-speak and double-cross.
Frankly, I can't imagine any other Mbeki appointee doing any better. It was an insane situation.
Hopefully, now that parliament is back in action after a long and SABC-damaging election layoff, a new parliamentary portfolio committee will get down to work and use its newly found powers to make radical changes to the board.
I live in hope that some day a communications portfolio committee will look at creating a board with their point of departure being creating a body that will give the SABC the best chance of fulfilling its public mandate and not just from the point of view of political one-upmanship.
The SABC board desperately needs to have some pragmatic business acumen on board and to balance this with people who actually understand what makes broadcasting profitable.
High expectations
Given a pragmatic, businesslike board, it is my bet that the first thing the portfolio committee would be told is probably that the political expectation of what the SABC should achieve is, right now, is far higher than it is able to do with current resources.
Government will have to decide what it wants. And my guess that its wish-list for SABC as it stands right now will mean that massive public funding will have to take place. In short, the ideal national broadcaster will by sheer necessity be one that is subsidised year in and year out.
Up till now the SABC hasn't even come close to fulfilling its mandate. Not even close since 1994.
On the other hand, if the SABC is supposed to try to be self-sustainable then even a standard four school kid with a calculator would be able to prove quite conclusively that there will never ever be enough licence fee, sponsorship or advertising revenue to be able to pay for it all. Because government is wanting a Rolls Royce and right now the best the SABC can produce is a somewhat underpowered combi taxi.
Over the past 40 years that I have been commenting on SABC affairs, I have heard a succession of CEO's tell me that they want to run the SABC as a business because "that is the only way."
Some of them got close to doing so only to be tripped up by political pressure and quite ludicrous delivery demands.
Leadership is vital
History has proven without doubt that every business lives or dies by its leader. And if that leader does not have the backing of both staff and shareholders, he or she might as well quit.
The portfolio committee desperately needs to understand what even the most ideal SABC is capable of.
The country is in a recession, so it is time to be businesslike and pragmatic. The days of wishful thinking about the SABC being absolutely all things to all people are gone, at least for the moment.
Government needs to let the SABC rebuild itself on business principles and once it is back in profit to then see just how that money can go towards reaching what has always been "the impossible dream."
Chris Moerdyk was head of strategic planning and public affairs for BMW South Africa and spent 16 years in the creative and client service departments of ad agencies, ending up as resident director of Lindsay Smithers-FCB in KwaZulu-Natal. Chris was recently listed in a Markinor survey as one of South Africa's top 10 marketing thought leaders. Apart from currently being a corporate marketing analyst, advisor and media commentator, he is non-executive chairman of Bizcommunity. Email Chris on and follow him on Twitter at @chrismoerdyk.
I think we all know this and have heard it a thousand times over.
The SABC needs to be scraped to the ground and start from fresh.... Think of it - 2 months turn around by the professional market and the political strand will be an entity of this strategy. For instance I trained 70 odd news journalists / news editors etc on post production software. Based on late 180 days payment I had to close my one company in 2007 and is still paying debt till today on my losses. Guess what... Even with a new SLA in place from the SABC I again got shafted, so again I will have to lose everything and start over.
SABC can be run so well if only the work the math.... LIke for instance ... they just buy buy buy buy new post equipment from someone getting rich selling them kit without even looking at specifications etc.... Before kit even arrive (plus minus 6 months or so ) they send people to come for basic editing ( the same classes we gave standard 3 school students) and have no idea what goes for what. I once had a disciplinary hearing at the SABC not about my service but about our lunch menu for 160+kg gentlemen.
I wish we can start over with all those resources and actually make a change where a change is desperately needed.
Who can I join to not feel so alone here? Posted on 8 Jun 2009 15:31
What is the point in continuing to hit a dead snake.Even morons know that SABC is a circus and it will continue to be a circus for many years to come no matter how many articles you write.. The attack on the dead snake is becoming boring. Give us more exciting marketing insights please. Posted on 8 Jun 2009 19:31
All 3 tiers of Government, and the SABC, have great difficulty operationalising strategy, as they lack capacity and staff to do so. If competent and qualified people are appointed, even with a huge drop in salaries, (starting with the President, his cabinet , DG's, MEC's and so on), we might be on the right track to beating the recession and the wasteful and fruitless expenditure.
Stop the gravy train with its political appointments and we have half a chance. Also, there are very few qualified Programme and Project managers within government and the SABC. What do you expect? No-one to successfully manage activities within budget, on time, to achieve the desired outcomes. Let the "Rainbow Nation" shine and miracles will happen. Posted on 8 Jun 2009 20:57
The problem is not a lack of "business" acumen. It is pure and simple criminality.
The board is/was overrun by people with "business acumen" - whose only goal is enrichment of syndicates like the Elephant Consortium (Gloria Serobe is still there!).
Only stupid commentators think that "business" people should be on the board of an entity that handles public money.
No way. That is suicide, as there are no directly involved shareholders to report to, and they start acting like "owners".
Let government please replace the "business minded people with HONEST citizens, like a police constable, a fireman, a volunteer at salvation army, various unpaid activists at NGO's, a rural "dominee, pastor or priest", two AUDITORS that hate each other, and will watch each other like hawks, brutally honest journalists, anything. BUT PLEASE KEEP YOUR BUSINESS PEOPLE FAR AWAY!!! (yes I am shouting, sorry, but I panic at advice like this) Posted on 9 Jun 2009 03:00
You were correct Chris and I guess I will be feeling the impact for many years to come, maybe even with a dislocated shoulder. Posted on 9 Jun 2009 22:09
It seems very logical to go this route. First get it back on track and stable, and then start demanding certain commitments from it (only what realistically can be achieved) and keep raising the bar... Posted on 13 Jun 2009 15:32
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This Message Board accepts no liability of legal consequences that arise from the Message Boards (e.g. libel, slander, or other such crimes). All posted messages are the sole property of their respective authors. The maintainer does retain the right to remove any message posts for whatever reasons. People that post messages to this forum are not to libel/slander nor in any other way depict a company, entity, individual(s), or service in a false light; should they do so, the legal consequences are theirs alone. Bizcommunity.com will disclose authors' IP addresses to authorities if compelled to do so by a court of law.