“Afstereo presently monitors 35 mainstream radio stations and television channels and compiles and maintains a vast pool of data that is now accessible to all companies and professional audit practices interested in this aspect of the business,” says Tonya Khoury, media business unit manager at Afstereo.
“Where we previously operated as the ‘back office' data provider to one particular professional practice, this agreement has now come to an end.”
Afstereo, reputedly the company that invented compliance certification in the South African broadcasting arena, claims 99.9% accurate tracking and reporting capabilities, according to a due diligence exercise completed by independent auditors.
Auditing broadcast accuracy
Compliance with good governance practices requires the auditing of the specific performance of broadcast media owners, which is often a difficult task for media agencies and marketers. Whilst the broadcasters can provide logs, it is extremely difficult for a client to independently identify and prove incidents where the spot was incorrectly broadcast. In many instances, mistakes are often only picked up long after the campaign has run and (in some instances) too late for the broadcaster to rectify the matter through conventional compensation practises.
“This information enables us to review all broadcast events and incidences retrospectively throughout the history of our data and in this way, we compile independent and accurate reports. We compare the confirmed booking schedule against the actual audio and rapidly identify and highlight any exceptions,” adds Khoury. “Our business model is constantly evolving, there is now a need in the market to feedback errors to the media owners within the context of the client's current campaign, allowing the media owner to rectify the error immediately so that the originally planned reach and frequency is achieved.”
“Our tracking and reporting systems are proven, unique and exacting and we are able to report on all broadcast spots (pre-recorded or not) - including those of advertisers who are not yet our clients,” says Khoury. “Our database is a record of actual performance and our records span the period from when we began tracking a particular medium.
Current inaccuracies
“Recently some spokespeople have made comments on the degree of inaccuracy of spot broadcasts and they have placed a value of compensation across the radio and television sectors. Whilst these claims have been somewhat alarmist, we have performed compliance certification on 70 824 radio spots this year and the error rate found on these spots is 4.63%“
“We have recently begun monitoring television and upon checking 11 772 spots we found that there is an error factor of 2%. With television you are more likely to find a ‘position in break' error than a non-flighting,” concludes Khoury.
Afstereo also offers comprehensive market intelligence for the advertising, marketing, media and music industries, which includes competitive data; content monitoring, sponsorship analysis and music reports.
If we have an error rate of between 2-5% across the board this could amount to between R160 - R 600 million on TV and Radio. I think that's worth knowing and claiming back if you are a client. If you're a media owner.... perhaps not! Posted on 18 Nov 2009 11:05
@ Nonsense - what level of mediocrity are you prepared to tolerate? Do you find it acceptable to pay in full for something, only to find that you actually received 5% less than what you paid for? No self-respecting auditor would allow that through the company's books without a proper query. Nor would a company/brand owner find that tolerable. C'mon now, get serious, in today's environment of digital operating systems, we should be aiming for- and trending towards- zero errors. Posted on 19 Nov 2009 15:29
What to you is a tolerable non-compliance rate? And in which areas of your life are you more accepting of errors?
If for example, your partner was 5% unfaithful? Would that be acceptable to you? Or would not knowing about it make it more acceptable?
Would you pay the full-price for a car, and then accept delivery of it sans a steering wheel?
From the media-owner perspective, it would be much better to find the errors as rapidly as possible and rectify them within the context of the campaign time-frame than to have to compensate up to a month (and beyond) after the event.
From the marketer's perspective, it is unfair to be measured on a campaign that did not run at 100% of reach/frequency planning. You may make 5% less sales, and that could be the difference between keeping, and losing, your job. Posted on 20 Nov 2009 10:15
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This Message Board accepts no liability of legal consequences that arise from the Message Boards (e.g. libel, slander, or other such crimes). All posted messages are the sole property of their respective authors. The maintainer does retain the right to remove any message posts for whatever reasons. People that post messages to this forum are not to libel/slander nor in any other way depict a company, entity, individual(s), or service in a false light; should they do so, the legal consequences are theirs alone. Bizcommunity.com will disclose authors' IP addresses to authorities if compelled to do so by a court of law.