Le Creuset loses promotional campaign case

© margo - Fotolia.com

Le Creuset demanded that ZZ2 immediately stop the campaign and, when ZZ2 refused to do so on the advice of its attorneys Adams & Adams, Le Creuset responded with an urgent application for an interdict in the Pretoria High Court.

Le Creuset argued that ZZ2's campaign resulted in a dilution of its famous cookware brand in that it took unfair advantage of the brand or that the campaign was otherwise likely to tarnish the elite brand, through its connection with fast-moving consumables. It also relied on the outdated notion that our common law recognises 'leaning-on' as a distinct species of unlawful competition.

The court refused the application and held that there was nothing unlawful about ZZ2's campaign.