For a deep dive into Stakeholder Reputation, watch this video of mine where I addressed the Institute of Internal Auditors a few years ago. An Organization derives its reputation from the way it’s performance, actions and behavior is perceived by stakeholders. These perceptions are influenced by the relationship building, communication and engagement practices of the organization. Also, read this -
Amelia Beattie has a poor track record when it comes to management in property.She was responsible for loosing Old Mutual Properties billions of rand through granting, unnecessarily, Pareto Properties pre-preemptive rights in metropolitan malls that OMP owned and would not own up to the mistake and got thrown out of OMP.Then she commenced to loose huge amounts of investor's money when she went to Stanlib in both the Stanlib's Direct Property Investment Franchise and Stanlib's Reit in West AfricaValue of Stanlib’s Africa fund tumbles 75% :Following disastrous business growth in West Africa, under Amelia Beattie's poor management, Stanlib then put up its advisory business in West Africa for sale:The losses at Stanlib's Africa Property Fund, under Beattie, were just so bad that it prompted 'fund of funds managers' to ask the regulator to investigate.But by this time Amelia Beattie, who has a history of value destruction and creating a toxic work environment, had jumped ship to head up Liberty Two Degrees.It is not known how she continues to be in charge of a listed company following such poor management.
The Truth is - the Truth just IS. Its neutral. Its our perceptions of the experience that creates the story. And everyone's is unique based on their limited personal experience. The collective experience determines the winning narrative - and still that is not the Truth. Now more than ever - our intuitive senses need to level up as technology does. What we should focus more on is the ability to observe the story unfolding and its purpose.
I've been waiting for my refund for more than 14 working days.I do not recommend buying anything from them online. They probably keep people's money for as long as possible so they get interest on the money. Some customers have been waiting for 3 months to receive their refund. It's absolutely pathetic.
There are numerous articles online, quoting surveys & research about the number of smokers who have stopped smoking, if sharing of cigarettes still occurs, the impact of the ban on smokers, the money lost in cigarette tax, the illegal trade, the disrespect that most of the country feels about the handling of the situation, whether hospitals are filled with smokers and whether smoking causes a more serious version of the virus.The articles always leave one feeling quite sure that the court would rule against the ban. All logic points to it.But in court, we keep losing. HOW??!Most the points above alone are good enough to lift the ban, so how is it possible that the court arrives at a different resolution? Where is the logical reasoning for each one of the above-mentioned points not carrying enough weight to warrant lifting the ban?What is the court’s response to government's evidence being low quality, incorrect and misleading? I haven’t read anything about the court being told to disregard that evidence.How can they POSSIBLY justify that it's worth losing the millions in cigarette tax? WE have to make that money up while that awful woman quietly says, 'it’s not that much money in the big picture'. Why does 1 woman have so much power? Why isn’t more being said about the left-over Jacob Zuma faction and the influence that a Zuma is still having. Why is she doing this to us, to our economy? Personal gain? How much would be enough to deliberately cause this much damage to our fragile economy, our trust and belief in government, the anger and hatred that is simmering country wide, disrespect to millions and millions of people including many highly regarded specialists who have voiced disapproval of the ban and requested it be lifted.That’s an awful lot of bad karma.