Submit newsAdvertise & rates  21°C Johannesburg Contact us
Special Focus on Media Freedom & Right to Know opinion

Why I dropped 'The Spear' - Ferial Haffajee

29 May 2012 04:572 comments1 BizLike
Commentary from City Press editor-in-chief Ferial Haffajee on the City Press decision to remove "The Spear" from their website.
"The Spear" is down - out of fear and care

"The Spear" is down. Out of care and as an olive branch to play a small role in helping turn around a tough moment, I have decided to take down the image.

When we published an art review, which featured "The Spear" as one image, I could not have anticipated that it would snowball into a moment of such absolute rage and pain. Have I been naïve in this? Perhaps.

City Press is not and has never been an object of division; neither am I. I prefer to understand City Press as a bridge across divides, a forum for debate.

We have just turned 30 years old and have exciting plans for City Press, which I do not want imperilled by us being forced into the role of opposition that discomforts me. My own identity is that of critical patriot, I am a great fan of my country, and that is how I want to edit. Besides, there are really important stories we lost sight of like the continued investigation into Lieutenant General Richard Mdluli, unemployment and the infrastructure budget.

That we are now a symbol of a nation's anger and rage is never the role of media in society. We are robust and independent, yes, but divisive and deaf, no.

There is a long history of art that has offended in South Africa, some of it the best we have ever made. You can see it here. I hope we are not crafting a society where we consign artists to still life's and the deep symbolism of repressed artists like China's Ai Weiwei in China. A society where we consign journalism to a free expression constrained by the limits of fear.

This week society began the path of setting its mores on how we treat presidents in art and journalism; what is acceptable and what is not.

I hope we will reach these conclusions decently in debates, colloquiums and plenaries rather than setting them in blood or angry red paint or in orange flames snaking up from burning pages.

The other lesson in all of this is that our common national dignity is still paper-thin; that our mutual understanding across cultures and races is still a work in progress and that pain is still deep. We have not yet defined a Mzansi way of maintaining a leader's dignity while exercising a robust free speech or reached an understanding that a leader embodies the nation, no matter what we may think of him or her. Neither does it seem our leaders know that dignity and respect are earned qualities too.

We take down the image in the spirit of peacemaking - it is an olive branch. But the debate must not end here and we should all turn this into a learning moment, in the interest of all our freedoms.

Fear
Of course, the image is coming down from fear too. I'd be silly not to admit that. The atmosphere is like a tinderbox: City Press copies went up in flames on Saturday; I don't want any more newspapers burnt in anger.

My colleague has been removed from a huge trade union congress and prevented from reporting - I don't want the lingering image (which in any event is viral) to stop us being able to do our core job. Our vendors are most at risk.

It was quite shocking to watch three big men of government, the SACP general-secretary Blade Nzimande; the governing party's Gwede Mantashe and its spokesperson Jackson Mthembu call City Press all manner of names and to call for a boycott. That they have failed is neither here nor there; that they did mark a moment of inflexion in our society.

It saddens me that not one of them nor a single representative of the governing alliance sought engagement with City Press before seeking a High Court interdict. For any editor to respond to a threat to take down an article of journalism without putting up a fight is an unprincipled thing to do, so we've fought as much as we could. It doesn't serve City Press or South Africa to dig in our heels and put our fingers in our ears.

The threats and invective against the writer of the review and a couple of us in the middle of the debate have been painful and have wrought a personal cost.

In this the national pain which columnist Justice Malala spoke about is ours too. I have had my intimate body savaged by social media personalities who wanted me, I guess, to feel their own and the president's humiliation.

I have. An ANC leader from my area on Twitter started a campaign of such disinformation I had to spend much of Saturday night quelling it. He knows where I live. What will he do next? The tweet that broke this camel's back was one by Patrice Motsepe (see correction below), the businessman and soccer baron whom I have known since university and with whom I thought I had a congenial relationship.

He said I probably don't want the painting to come down as I need it for the long lonely nights. I presume he meant its phallus. He knows I am single. It must have taken great anger to get a man I know to be of elegance and wit to get to such a point.

I play tough tackle and expect to get intellectually whipped when I do. But this humiliation I can well live without. It's simply not worth it and I guess we have made our point and must move on.

It has been brought to our attention that the Patrice Motsepe account on Twitter is a fake account. Motsepe's lawyers are looking into the matter.

The original story can be found at http://www.citypress.co.za/SouthAfrica/News/The-Spear-is-down-out-of-care-and-fear-20120528.
 
More options
Anonimity
The Problem with Individuals as Symbols

Symbols carry meaning. That is their job. The cross carries all the many meanings we understand Christianity to embrace; the Star of David carries all of what Judaism means. What they symbolise is complex but these symbols are mere inert pictures; they do not interfere by their own behaviour with the messages they convey. They are susceptible of manipulation - the Catholic Church’s cross is more ornate than the Methodist's - but there are limits to what can be done with decoration. Contrast the inert symbol with the living human being. Dead ones are bad enough. The founder of the Mormon Church in the USA is a deceased polygamist who causes ripples of anxiety in the church leadership whenever a "historic" document is unearthed revealing some alleged failing in the great leader. Political symbols like the Queen of England are hard-working if exceptionally well paid servants to the meanings they must carry. The values that the Queen represents are not party political though plainly she stands more for Tory than Labour. Her job is to convey national values; the meanings she carries reach across history. What then of Zuma? First let’s look at Mandela. Mandela is a symbol of black pride, dignity and courageous resistance to oppression and perhaps above all of the strength and wisdom of forgiveness. He carries these meanings well and only Winnie threatened to go off message, at which point he parted from her and stayed true to the meanings that are his job to represent for all of us. Mandela was conscious of the visual dominance in the senses of human beings, so he wore appropriate clothes and always looked the part. So what of Zuma? He cannot be asked to attain the status of Mandela, no-one can. Zuma is in the dirty battlefield of electoral politics and a living active politician struggling with a massive national project and all that comes with it. Yet he is a symbol of the same values that Mandela and his party stand for, particularly the dignity of an oppressed people now stepping up to their rightful place as equals to all other races and nations. Unlike Mandela, Zuma represents not only this but the traditional polygamist African set of values. Yet his practice of infidelity, of paying lobola after impregnating a lover does not affirm or express the dignified process of consultation with family members that is prescribed by observance of the traditions. He corrupts the African institutions in the way he flouts them, yet hypocritically calls them in aid when he tries to deflect criticism. His looting of the national coffers, aided and abetted by seducers like Schabir Shaik, is another example of his weakness as a leader. Upholding the law is the first job of a leader. How else does one explain the Zuma family members who have risen to millionaire status in improbably short time? And therein lies the problem with individuals as symbols. Here is a symbol that does not stay peacefully above the altar. This one will go padding around the house at night looking for a house guest to have his way with. There is no more powerful image than the human form. The age of digital photography and broadband facilitates millions of images of the dear leader. Mugabe's portrait all over every institution of public life in Zimbabwe illustrates his insight into the power of reinforcing your brand, particularly where literacy is an issue. Zuma’s image conveys a compromised set of values, that it is ok to dip into the funds meant for the nation to help yourself and your family, even if that means children will go without schools. That it is ok to have a baby or two out of wedlock with a friend’s daughter, even if that means giving ammunition to your peoples’ most bitter critics. The distance between how Zuma behaves and the messages we all need to him to carry is vast, and into this gap falls much that is misconstrued as racism and apparent rejection of traditional African values. When the criticism is of the individual but the individual is a symbol, then the criticism strikes not only at the man but at all that he stands for, even if the criticism is aimed at his failure to uphold what he should stand for. A criticism of the man does not necessarily imply a criticism of what he is supposed to stand for. The narrower the gap between what he stands for and how he behaves, the closer will his people be to each other. We need a leader who is more disciplined about the job of being a symbol. He can't escape being one; he could just be a lot better at it.

Anonymous Posted on 29 May 2012 16:35
GOOLAM SULEMAN
I respect and admire your courage Ferial. You made your point & the rest is up to the 'faint-hearted' to decipher. Posted on 29 May 2012 22:03
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This Message Board accepts no liability of legal consequences that arise from the Message Boards (e.g. defamation, slander, or other such crimes). All posted messages are the sole property of their respective authors. The maintainer does retain the right to remove any message posts for whatever reasons. People that post messages to this forum are not to libel/slander nor in any other way depict a company, entity, individual(s), or service in a false light; should they do so, the legal consequences are theirs alone. Bizcommunity.com will disclose authors' IP addresses to authorities if compelled to do so by a court of law.

Subscribe to industry newsletters

Related tweets

Bizcommunity has over 400 industry contributors and we always welcome further contributions and contributors.

Subscribe

Receive free email newsletter

Make us your homepageAdd us to your favoritesRSS feedGet biz on your phoneFollow us

Invite

Tell a friend about us