LONDON, UK: Interbrand, one of the world's leading brand consultancies and author of the annual Best Global Brands Report, has released its 2012 Best Global Green Brands Report. Toyota (#1), Johnson & Johnson (#2), and Honda (#3) top the ranking with Danone (#9), Ford (#15), Starbucks (#36) and UPS (#43) representing this year's top risers.
This year's report shows that industries around the world are taking actionable and quantifiable measures to improve both their sustainability performance and their degree of external reporting.
As sustainability initiatives continue to gain relevance in the C-suite and with consumers, companies in all sectors are striving to strike a winning balance between building a green business and effectively communicating sustainable practices in the global marketplace. Interbrand's 2012 Best Global Green Brands Report
examines the gap that exists between corporate environmental practices and consumer perception of those practices using its 2011 Best Global Brands Report
, extensive consumer research and performance data provided by Deloitte - data based upon publicly available information.Sustainability is a 'must have' not a 'nice to have'
"Sustainability has proven to be a strategic and profitable aspect of business and a brand strengthening asset," said Jez Frampton, global chief executive officer of Interbrand. "It is crucial that consumers' impressions of a brand are in close alignment with that brand's actual environmental performance. Otherwise, a brand's efforts in this area could serve as an under-used asset, or, conversely, suffer due to accusations of 'greenwashing.'"
David Pearson, global sustainability leader, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, noted "It is becoming increasingly clear that sustainability is a 'must have' rather than a 'nice to have' for a lot of companies. It matters from a growth perspective; it matters from a cost and margin perspective; it matters from a brand value perspective. Closing the gap between sustainability performance and market perception is an incredibly important part of taking and continuing the sustainability
Adds Jeremy Sampson, chairman of Johannesburg based Interbrand Sampson: 'Africa more than ever is the great opportunity for brand owners in the next decade. All the global giants are moving in, if they aren't here already, and bringing with them their best global sustainability practices.'Key themesAutomotive and technology brands dominate the 2012 ranking
In this year's report, automotive and technology brands dominate the ranking. Toyota maintains the number one spot, continuing to make environmental sustainability a core management priority. The original Prius model - the primary launch pad for Toyota's green image - has recently been expanded to encompass an entire family of sustainable automobiles, including the company's first plug-in model. This year, Toyota also achieved near zero-landfill status at all of its North American manufacturing plants, and continues its commitment to build LEED certified buildings and dealerships.
With long-term goals around fuel efficiency, superior energy use, and the reduction of toxic emissions, the automotive industry has been able to turn such consideration points into areas of environmental leadership. The industry as a whole has launched a competitive range of high-profile alternative fuel vehicles - from electric models to hybrids - and even some with internal combustible engines. Eight automotive brands appear in this year's Best Global Green Brands ranking, with four brands ranking in the top 10: Toyota (#1), Honda (#3), Volkswagen (#4), BMW(#10), Ford (#15), Mercedes-Benz (#16), Hyundai (#17), and Nissan (#21). Overall, the automotive brands' investment in developing and marketing fuel-efficient and alternative fuel vehicles is paying off - in terms of both performance and perception.
As technology continues to play a prominent role in consumers' lives, leading technology brands are spearheading efforts to reduce their environmental impact. Panasonic jumped four spots to #6 in the Best Global Green Brands
ranking this year. To showcase its leadership and comprehensive green technologies - ranging from consumer electronics to energy management systems - the company recently announced the conversion of a former factory site in Fujisawa near Tokyo into a "Sustainable Smart Town," scheduled to be operation in 2014. Additionally, the brand has received recognition and a number of accolades from highly recognised indexes for corporate sustainability, including that from SAM (Sustainable Asset Management) and METI (the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry).New entrant: Nissan
Nissan (#21), the Japanese automaker, appeared in this year's Best Global Green Brands Report
for the first time. Nissan is making ambitious moves to reduce its carbon footprint worldwide with a new six-year environmental action plan called the Nissan Green Program. From the development of a new easier-to-install EV quick charger to pilot programs aimed at making cities EV ready, Nissan has set the stage for continued success in a world that looks poised to embrace zero emission mobility - and this is reflected in a high perception score.Top Risers: Danone and Ford
Danone (#9) improved its ranking by remaining fiercely committed to reducing its carbon footprint by 30% by the end of 2012. It has already reached a level of -27.5%. Danone's co-creation of the "Livelihoods Fund" in 2011 marks yet another milestone in its sustainability strategy. Ford (#15), too, stands out as a 2012 Best Global Green Brands success story. This year, the brand saw significant improvement in its environmental performance around both its operations (emissions, resource industry, etc), as well as its approach to transparent engagement and disclosure on its activities and its environmental impact. While the brand ranks #15 overall, Ford's ability to maintain strong green perceptions while simultaneously improving its environmental performance serves as a great example to other global brands. United States, Germany and Japan lead in terms of manufacturing and managing green brands
This year's Top 50 Best Global Green Brands include 22 brands manufactured and managed in the United States. The leading American brand is Johnson & Johnson (#2), followed by Hewlett-Packard (#5), Dell (#7), Cisco (#11), and 3M (#12). Due to their technology and automotive brand dominance, Japan and Germany follow the United States. Each of these countries produced 7 of this year's top 50
Best Global Green Brands.Methodology
The foundation of the annual Best Global Green Brands Report
is Interbrand's annual Best Global Brands Report
. It is a report that, when published each fall, ranks 100 brands - brands that have a global presence and a record of delivering value to stakeholders.
To make the top 50 Best Global Green Brands
, organisations must perform well in terms of both sustainability performance and perception. Brands are measured against two sets of criteria:
- Performance: Organisations must demonstrate that they source, produce, and distribute products and services in an environmentally responsible manner.
- Perception: Organisations must work to build value amongst key audiences by credibly conveying the benefits of their environmental practices.
- What Interbrand refers to as "the gap" is the difference between a brand's performance and perception scores.
- A positive gap indicates sustainability performance is actually higher than consumers perceive it to be.
- A negative gap indicates consumers perceive a brand to be more of a sustainable leader than it actually is.
Deloitte examines each brand's performance in terms of its sustainability/environmental initiatives as an input to Interbrand's overall scoring methodology. For the purposes of the annual Best Global Green Brands Report
, Deloitte developed a corporate environmental performance methodology based on publicly available data drawn from such sources as Corporate Social Responsibility/Sustainability Reports, Carbon Disclosure Project Responses, Annual Reports, 10-k filings, Company Websites, and the ASSET4 Database from Thomson Reuters. A brand's Green Performance Score is composed of 82 metrics upon which each brand is ranked. The metrics evaluate companies' disclosure and environmental performance across six "pillars:" Governance, Operations, Transportation and Logistics, Stakeholder Engagement, and Supply Chain. Such data is then inputted into Interbrand's overall scoring methodology.Perception assessment
Interbrand examines how consumers perceive a brand's sustainability efforts. Each brand's perception score is determined through a consumer study covering 10 000 respondents; 1,000 in each of the 10 largest economies, including the US, Japan, China, Germany, France, UK, Italy, Brazil, India, and Canada. 1250 consumers using Interbrand's six external brand strength pillars assess each brand: Authenticity, Relevance, Differentiation, Consistency, Presence, and Understanding.Overall score
The Best Global Green Brand report's overall scores are calculated by combining the standardised performance and perception scores. A discount factor is applied in those cases where positive perceptions of the brand outweigh a company's actual green performance. The final ranking is determined based on the change in each brand's overall score, relative to that brand's 2011 result.
To learn more about Interbrand's 2012 Best Global Green Brands Report
, please visit www.BestGlobalGreenBrands.comAbout Interbrand
Founded in 1974, Interbrand is one of the world's largest branding consultancies. With nearly 40 offices in 25 countries, Interbrand's combination of rigorous strategy, analytics and world-class design enables it to assist clients in creating and managing brand value effectively across all touchpoints in all market dynamics. Interbrand is widely recognised for its Best Global Brands Report
, the definitive guide to the world's most valuable brands, as well as its Best Global Green Brands
report, which identifies the gap between customer perception and a brand's performance relative to sustainability. Interbrand is also known for having created http://www.brandchannel.com
, an international online exchange and resource about brand marketing and branding.About Interbrand Sampson
Based in Johannesburg, with offices in Cape Town, Accra, Gaborone, Lagos and Nairobi, we act as a hub for Africa. Increasingly, brands are becoming regional and global. Interbrand serves the world with over 38 offices in more than 20 countries. Working in close partnership with our clients we combine the rigorous strategy and analysis of brand consulting with world-class design and creativity. This reach enables us to conduct global research, investigate emerging trends, introduce brands across markets, and better service our clients where they want to do business. Interbrand Sampson has won FinWeek
's AdReview 'Best Branding and Design Agency' in 2009 and 2010. Interbrand is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Omnicom Group, the global leader in marketing and corporate communications.About Deloitte's Sustainability Services Group
Deloitte's sustainability services group draws on the insights and experience of Deloitte's four primary businesses - consulting, audit, tax, and financial advisory services - and industry-specific practices across corporate strategy and operations, supply chain, mergers and acquisitions, human capital and enterprise risk management. The result is a broad set of capabilities that address a range of domestic and global business opportunities and risks related to energy supply, demand and efficiency, water and other resource scarcity, carbon and greenhouse gas regulation and demand for increased transparency and confirmation of non-financial performance. For more information, go to http://www.deloitte.com/us/sustainability
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee, and its network of member firms, each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. Please see www.deloitte.com/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and its member firms. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about
for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting.
|2012 Rank||Brand||Change in Rank||2012 Gap|
|2||Johnson & Johnson ||+2||3.9|
|47||Credit Suisse ||-3||-0.2|