NEWSWATCH: Court reporting is notoriously one of the most strictly regulated fields of journalism, which is why media celebrated this morning when granted an application to take still pictures of the #DrosRape accused.
Acumen Media’s seven-day analysis confirms that South African social media feeds were filled with violent images arising from the #DrosRape incident.
Social media's #MobJustice took hold following graphic scenes from a video taken in the bathroom of the Dros Silverton restaurant, in which a seven-year-old girl was raped.
Government has noted a disturbing video circulating on social media involving the alleged rape of a child. We appeal to the public to remain calm and allow the law to take its course. The perpetrator has been remanded in custody and will appear in court on 2 October. #Dros#GBV
Little wonder then that the case’s court proceedings – the accused's second appearance – were a big talking point today, with a strong police presence, and protesters demanding justice outside the Pretoria Magistrate’s Court.
The accused has still not pleaded, so his name is meant to be withheld from publication until he officially pleads in court – this despite some media already naming the accused and posting images of his face.
No bail, fears of mob justice
The accused did not apply for bail – Times Live reports he has sustained several injuries during his arrest, and will remain in custody until the case resumes on 1 November.
Fears of mob justice prevail. But a highlight from News24’s live feed of updates from this morning’s court case was that of the court granting a media application to take still pictures of the accused, both before and after proceedings.
Mail & Guardian confirms that Magistrate Mali Mokwena ruled that the media may take still photographs 15 minutes before and 15 minutes after court proceedings.
The accused promptly put on a hoodie, but some managed a quick snap before he did so:
I'm willing to bet that the picture with the hoodie will be the one used as the "official photo" by white media even though both pictures were taken minutes away from each other after the ruling . #DrosRapepic.twitter.com/FwP0MJs9Oi
Attorney for the accused, Rian Du Plessis of Legal Aid, argued against the application, stating the court must decide between the rights of the media to report and the accused's rights to privacy and a fair trial.
#DrosRapist The court has granted the media application to take stills of the accused before and after court proceedings in court. People in the gallery applaud @TeamNews24
News24 journalist Alex Mitchley tweeted that Du Plessis eventually conceded that there are indeed pictures and a video of the accused that have been circulated on social media, but says those images don't depict the accused in the court environment.
Ultimately, the State said the application was too late, particularly as the pictures and even name of the accused had already been widely distributed, but agreed that initial photographs identifying the accused should not have been taken and published.
Unfortunately, all did not go to plan for the media photographers at the court:
The Magistrate granted an application to shoot stills before and after court proceedings for 15 minutes in the #Drosrape case, however, the accused was taken out of court even before the magistrate left, so journos' could not photo him. Seems like the defying of a court order?
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This Message Board accepts no liability of legal consequences that arise from the Message Boards (e.g. defamation, slander, or other such crimes). All posted messages are the sole property of their respective authors. The maintainer does retain the right to remove any message posts for whatever reasons. People that post messages to this forum are not to libel/slander nor in any other way depict a company, entity, individual(s), or service in a false light; should they do so, the legal consequences are theirs alone. Bizcommunity.com will disclose authors' IP addresses to authorities if compelled to do so by a court of law.