I wonder how many advertising strategists and creatives actually ever sit down in front of their TV sets and watch a whole evening of programmes?
I don't believe they do - and neither do their bosses - because just about all the ad agency and media buying house managing directors I talk to these days tell me that it is a huge problem getting creatives, strategists and media buyers to watch, listen to or read the media into which they are ploughing their clients' money.
And not just to do this once or twice, but regularly.
But, the purpose of my wanting them to sit down and watch an evening of television and preferably not their favourite channels, has got nothing to do with understanding the medium but everything to do with waking up to a phenomenon that is inexorably manifesting itself on our TV screens.
It is the metamorphosis of our advertising industry into an 'advertainment' industry.
One has to be pretty blind not to see what is happening.
Nice ad... but what was the brand? (Image: Aaron Escobar, Wikimedia Commons)
I'm finding more and more people who email or phone me to tell me about an ad they'd seen telling the same story.
"Did you see that great ad? Wow, it was fantastic and the lighting and photography was just phenomenal etc etc. No, I can't remember what it was for but wow, it was a great ad..."
I listened to yet another radio talk show on advertising a while back and it was the same thing. Caller after caller waxing lyrical about the wonderful ads they'd seen. I actually kept count for an hour. Exactly 70% could not remember what the ad was about, what it was selling, or what the brand was.
Another 20% remembered quite definitely in their opinion what the ad was selling but got the product or brand wrong.
This left only 10% actually knowing what the ad was all about. Only 10% of people who had not only noticed and ad, but also watched it, absorbed it, got excited about it and then went to the trouble of phoning a radio station to talk about it.
Is it branding gone mad?
Now this was not an isolated case. I listen to many radio talk shows on advertising and recently the incidence of callers not being able to identify ads they liked so much has increased alarmingly.
Now just what could be the motivation to go this current strategic and creative route, I wonder?
Is it pandering to a client ego that requires his peers to gush over his creative genius? Is it agency profiteering from naive clients with expensive ads with the bulk of the budget going on production and very little on actual flighting?
Is it branding gone mad? Chasing awards perhaps? Or is it a desperate attempt to break through the increasing clutter and get noticed by viewers who are becoming increasingly distracted by all sorts of time-consuming things other than watching ads?
Let's be blunt - there's a lot of crap out there
Is it a coincidence that this situation seems to be getting a lot worse just as we see adspend growing after all those years in the doldrums? Are ad agencies so very busy right now that they don't have the time to really think about what they are doing?
Of course, I am generalising. There are some very good ads out there. There are agencies doing some great work.
But there is an enormous amount of absolute crap.
Oh, I know those legions of over-sensitive and precious people in the ad industry will just think that I am being overly critical.
But this isn't at all about what I think. It is about the fact that eight out of every 10 people who phone in to radio talk shows and enthuse over their favourite ads have no idea at all about what their favourite ad is representing, selling or promoting. No idea at all.
Surely, that should worry the hell out of anyone in the ad industry right now?
Apart from being a corporate marketing analyst, advisor and media commentator, Chris Moerdyk is a former chairman of Bizcommunity. He was head of strategic planning and public affairs for BMW South Africa and spent 16 years in the creative and client service departments of ad agencies, ending up as resident director of Lindsay Smithers-FCB in KwaZulu-Natal. Email Chris on and follow him on Twitter at @chrismoerdyk.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This Message Board accepts no liability of legal consequences that arise from the Message Boards (e.g. defamation, slander, or other such crimes). All posted messages are the sole property of their respective authors. The maintainer does retain the right to remove any message posts for whatever reasons. People that post messages to this forum are not to libel/slander nor in any other way depict a company, entity, individual(s), or service in a false light; should they do so, the legal consequences are theirs alone. Bizcommunity.com will disclose authors' IP addresses to authorities if compelled to do so by a court of law.
Agreed. Too many creatives, particularly young ones, are under the impression that advertising is about creating art, for art's sake, rather than selling a product (perhaps in the process also creating something beautiful). Interesting, too, how many of us from the era can still recall great ads from the 80s and 90s in such detail - the jingle, the words AND the product being touted...the Dunlop dog...the Bic pens clown...Morkels, your two year guarantee store...Joshua Doore, your uncle in the furniture business...I could go on and on but perhaps I'm just showing my age...
The job of the marketer is "to sell more stuff to more people more often" If your proposition (marketing & advertising) is not doing that then stop it immediately. So, all advertising should be selling the brand as a priority. If people cannot remember the brand then you were not selling the brand. Marketers need to be stronger on ensuring they sell their brand and not succumb to the whims of the creatives....