Submit newsAdvertise & rates  21°C Johannesburg Contact us
Press offices

Opinion: Grist for the marketing mill

Time for a long hard look at The Loerie Awards

28 Aug 2012 12:2522 comments4 BizLikes
The only possible justification for an event such as the annual Loerie Awards is that it gives the people who work in advertising agencies an opportunity to escape the daily grind of watching creativity stifled by commercial interests.
Being in advertising is like Andy Warhol being forced to paint by committee. It is often a frustrating business in which creative people are harassed by control-freak clients or bosses who regularly sacrifice great ideas on the altar of expediency.

Having worked in an ad agency for many years, I can sympathise with those who just want to go away for a Loeries weekend and party up a storm.

No benefits

Other than that, The Loerie Awards have no benefits whatsoever.

Award-winning advertising is not chosen on the basis of efficiency or effectiveness but purely and simply on the gut-feel of peers. It is like choosing a car of the year because it just looks as though it can go fast and be a useful tool in helping pimply young Lotharios to pick up women. Without any consideration given to the fact that it was grossly underpowered and completely failed all known safety rating tests.

Statistically, 20% of all advertising not only fails but also actually damages the brand it is supposed to be promoting.

Massive wastage

In South African terms that is in the region of R4 billion a year. Completely wasted.

One of South Africa's most decorated marketers, Colin Adcock, banned any involvement in advertising awards when he was managing director of Lindsay Smithers - at the time one of South Africa's biggest agencies. He did so quite simply because he firmly believed that there was far too much temptation to produce award-winning ads in an effort to gain more clients or look good on individual CV's, rather than produce advertising to sell products.

That such a high percentage of failure in the adverting is directly related to the quest for awards is, in my opinion, a no-brainer.

The thing, of course, is that the business of advertising awards has become just that - a business. The Cannes Lions Awards is a massive money-spinner for the organisers, as are most other global advertising showcases.

Bun fights

In SA, right now, The Loerie Awards organisers are embroiled in a completely unnecessary bun-fight, having refused accreditation to a journalist who happened to annoy them a couple of years ago. The Loerie organisers are an arrogant bunch who want their bread buttered on both sides. They want the media to help them tell the world how wonderful they are but they also want it done entirely on their terms. They want sunshine journalism.

Frankly, the way they are behaving right now is pretty much in keeping with the ANC's iniquitous Protection of Information Bill and media appeals tribunal idea. Because of their childish attitude, Bizcommunity.com in 2010 withdrew its media partnership with The Loerie Awards. And quite rightly too.

Efforts to engage with the advertising industry just after that came to nothing. The ad industry just could not be bothered.

It is time, I feel for the advertising industry to reconsider its position. To decide what is and what is not important to them. Times are tough right now. They will get a lot tougher.

Banning ads

Government wants to ban alcohol and junk food advertising.

No wonder, because politicians see the banning of advertising as something politically correct and without even the most remote chance of losing votes. In fact, it will gain them voters.

The general public has no opinion on the advertising industry other than whether they like or dislike an advertisement.

Were the government to ban all advertising tomorrow, indications are that 90% of the South African population would not give a damn. The consumer views the advertising industry as some kind if trivial pursuit - a perception that is strengthened when stupid advertising is produced and ends up being banned.

No sign of action

Politicians will continue to target the ad industry because it is safe to so do.

It is time, in my opinion, that the ad industry gets it priorities right and starts spending at least as much time on improving its public image as it does in self-adulation.

For almost 30 years now, I have been told that the ad industry is about to embark on a campaign to improve its image.

Absolutely nothing has happened.

I don't expect anything to happen.

The ad industry is nothing more than a band playing on the deck of the Titanic and partying up a storm while just around the corner an iceberg of consumer apathy and political interference is waiting. Waiting.

Time to wake up, people.

For more:For More list updated at 9.48am on 6 September 2012.
 
More options

About Chris Moerdyk: @chrismoerdyk

Apart from currently being a corporate marketing analyst, advisor and media commentator, Chris Moerdyk is non-executive chairman of Bizcommunity. He used to be head of strategic planning and public affairs for BMW South Africa and spent 16 years in the creative and client service departments of ad agencies, ending up as resident director of Lindsay Smithers-FCB in KwaZulu-Natal. Email Chris on and follow him on Twitter at @chrismoerdyk.View MyBiz profile and articles...
One man one vote one time
Whoohaah Chris

As usual you tell it like it is!

This going to stir the proverbial hornets nest! David Ogilvy did say, it isn't creative unless it sells. We are going to hear arguments that support the premise that award winning ads sell, and the counter to that.

I woud love to hear from experienced marketers and brand managers whether they really honestly believe that award winning work sells their products.

Many agencies have set themselves up on the back of being award winning. I see so many adds for new creatives demanding award winners only need apply. The industry has become obsessed with awards and that is your very point.

I have had a long career in the industry producing work that has sold a lot of my clients products. Yes, I have won awards in the process, but my first endeavour has always been to sell on behalf of my clients.

I look forward with great interest, to the oncoming arguments! Posted on 28 Aug 2012 14:01
Too blinking true!
As a marketer and brand manager, I absolutely agree with what Chris says. I am so sick and tired of my agency trying to bully me into "agency recommendation" not because it is good for my brand but because it's sexy and "possibly" award winning. I also detest the arrogance of them telling me that "they know" what will work even though I have had many, many more years experience in the undustry than they have and I also KNOW my damn brand! Posted on 28 Aug 2012 14:16
Grant Shippey
I would love to see a correlation between "award winning work" and actual objectives met. Perhaps some larger brands, with a portfolio of campaigns, should do the exercise.

Or even put more simply. Award Winning campaign, Sales up or Sales down (relatively of course). Posted on 28 Aug 2012 14:34
Brand Manager
Well if this is going to turn into a bun fight, let me grab hold of a few Danishes.

This article is appallingly over-simplistic. Of course there are lots of unscrupulous creative people trying to sell ideas to brand managers for the sake of their own egos and career aspirations. But for every one of those people there are many more who attempt to innovate for the sake of good marketing.

New ideas get noticed. By everyone. Including the customers who buy products. Posted on 28 Aug 2012 14:38
pasau
you're pissin' in the wind. too many egos involved. agencies will continue to be full of themselves until the last one gets sucked down the drain. Posted on 28 Aug 2012 14:41
Scott Scott
Here we going regarding the link between award-winning work and ROI

http://www.canneslions.com/creativebravery/ Posted on 28 Aug 2012 14:53
Jakes
Quite simply, it is time for the Loeries to start considering accountability and campaign results. Posted on 28 Aug 2012 14:55
joostus
Chris, one of Europe's top creative agencies, KesselsKramer, decided at their start not be part of the award-show business for more or less the same reasons as you are talking about. Some 15 years later, and still on top of their game, it hasn't stopped them from growing their (international) business or reputation. Posted on 28 Aug 2012 14:55
Give creatives a break
Geepers, Chris, another rant about how useless the Loerie Awards are. Most of the creatives in South Africa are generally paid the least in agencies, even though their ideas are what count. How about you give them a break, and let them get some well deserved credit for the amount of time they put in to what they do. Sure there are a lot of scam ads around the world, but there are also loads and loads of ideas that are awarded and are success stories in selling product. Posted on 28 Aug 2012 15:02
Andrea Desfarges
As a PR Director at an Ad agency, I've seen how client's view awards as a sign of what you can do for them. They have no idea what the Loeries are or how they work - and they don't care. They just want an idication that their money is being well spent. Most of them don't understand marketing themselves. Tired of the C word. Creative. Posted on 28 Aug 2012 15:05
Couch Zambane
I'd like to put a word in for consumers and advertising industry outsiders - the so-called "general public"...

We may not have an intimate understanding of the industry, but we definitely have views beyond ad likes and dislikes. Advertisers are just failing to value our opinions and engage us in a conversation. When last did an advertising award seriously incorporate the opinions of its intended consumers? We are not as passive and apathetic as you think. Don't forget who pays your bills.

You're right. The advertising industry should catch a wake up! Posted on 28 Aug 2012 15:31
Anton Crone
Hi Chris,

Good to read your opinion piece, but it does not put a very good argument forward.

Advertising is not the only industry that enters award shows. Certainly within the arts and media field they are very common, and one can argue positively that they improve the standard of work immensely and thereby engage audiences. Look at the Academy Awards and many other respected film awards, then the Pulitzers, Man Booker Prize and so on. Where would this work be without them?

Likewise, the value of an advertising award show is to improve the standard of work to engage audiences. By and large, the big ad award shows do that. Imagine the level of advertising WITHOUT them. It would be abysmal. Far, far worse than the standard we see today.

You say in your opening statement: "The only possible justification for an event such as the annual Loerie Awards is that it gives the people who work in advertising agencies an opportunity to escape the daily grind of watching creativity stifled by commercial interests."

If it were not for the Loeries, there would be far, far fewer creative people in the industry because creativity wouldn't be stifled - it would hardly exist. Again, imagine the standard of local advertising then.

The Loeries is far from perfect. What that awards show and agencies can do to improve the level advertising would require a separate opinion piece. But having no other benefits than escaping the daily grind and partying up a storm? far from the truth. Posted on 28 Aug 2012 16:20
Past Loerie Winner
The Loeries is a complete sham. In fact when judging the awards the judges must assume that the work was highly successful and judge it on the creative merits. This basically says that the business case is not important and its just about how cool the work is.

In fact the 2011 Grand Prix is proof of this. It never really saw the light of day in just met the minimum entry criteria in that it appeared in the Musica Waterfront store for a couple of hours. If it was such a truly great piece of work why did the client never roll it out? The answer is pretty simple the entry claimed its purpose was to get more people into the store. The problem is that the device only allowed one person at a time to use it. So its like having a CD store at the waterfront but only one shopper is allowed in a time. IMHO a complete failure on the business case and a creative failure as it doesn't work in the real world. If the Loeries had any back bone they would have disqualified this work as it was clearly manufactured for awards. Posted on 28 Aug 2012 17:25
Simone Puterman: editor-at-large
Actually, I saw the Musica "Flo Browser" in Musica at The Zone@Rosebank. I just can't remember when exactly I saw it but I think it was after last year's ad award season. Posted on 29 Aug 2012 15:44
Past Loerie Winner
You're missing the point. Even if it was in say couple stores for a brief moment of time. Its never been rolled out because there is no business case for this type of device. And this is an example of communication failure. The judges missed the point and judged purely on the bells and whistles. Great communication is producing a great creative solution within the constraints of a client's business. Any fool can produce amazing creative work if there are no constraints. Its like awarding ejecting seats in a helicopter as the greatest invention of our lifetimes, but with out considering that the occupant would be killed by the blades of the helicopter. Posted on 31 Aug 2012 14:46
Pussy Riot
Wow, is Chris Moerdyk threatening the Ad Industry with some weird possibility that government might ban advertising and then he'll get his sweet revenge, or things of that nature?

Moerdyk, if that happens, we're all in A LOT MORE trouble: can you say "Pussy Riot"?

And you're wrong about the "public" not caring, people will go nuts if this happens, precisely for the above reason. Posted on 29 Aug 2012 00:36
soul destroyer
Don't kid yourselves.

Yes, there are some wonderfully creative ads on TV, and by creative, I mean that the public actually enjoy watching them:

The new BMW ad where it reads out the emails is very clever and so different from regular BMW ads.

Mercedes = unold. Are you @#%& serious??!

And if I have to listen to that whistle on the Flora ad once more I'm going to beat my TV with a stick).

Twelve hours at your desk daily, insane deadlines and massive (mostly stupid) expectations of the client, doth not a happy creative make.

Get out while you still have a soul, creative. Posted on 29 Aug 2012 09:14
One man one vote one time
The trouble with Creative Awards is that they are purely subjective. And with the Loeries, it is all about the lobbying and who shouts loudest.

Bring in Effies and see how things change. Present a clear case for how a campaign has taken a product/brand from not performing well, to a much better position, based on facts and figures, not just, 'It is so like, creative!'. Posted on 30 Aug 2012 10:29
Leon Jacobs
Chris,

I couldn't work out whether your attack was on the value of creativity in communication or whether it was simply just a rant on the perceived imperfections of the Loeries?

Anyone who has travelled around the world can tell you that South Africa, consistently, has produced better advertising than most other countries. To produce something that is entertaining is a token of respect to the person whose daily life you are interrupting. To make it memorable, is a responsibility to your client. I would argue that if the Loeries did not exist, South Africa would not have an ad industry of quality.

Sure, it has plenty of imperfections. Ego is an awful byproduct of the creative industry. But not having a benchmark of creativity will completely drain the media of interestingness.

Others, like Charl Thom, have powerfully argued and demonstrated the link between creativity and ROI. I will point out two final observations:

Last year, when our agency won a gold lion for film at Cannes, it opened up a flood of interested agency professionals who wanted to come and work with us. Not just creatives, great account people and planners who saw our work, liked it, and wanted to be part of that. And you can only have a great agency if you can attract great people.

Finally, every year, around the world, screenings of the Cannes finalists and winners attract queues of everyday people, willing to pay money to watch an hour and a half's worth of advertising.

That is something worth thinking about. Posted on 1 Sep 2012 07:29
Cheers
Assuming that I understood your argument, thank you.

I assume that you're presenting creatives not only as individuals who make interesting artifacts but who produce functional tools. Also, I assume that you are suggesting that promoting interesting artifacts over functional tools is a mistake, as it casts a rather depressing shadow over creatives who really attempt to make their ads work ('work' being defined as 'genuinely benefit consumers by successfully marketing a useful product in a manner that is inspiring not only to creatives, but to everyone else').

That was a nice thought. Hopefully some other people take it into account instead of using this post as a tool to shout about awards they have won. Posted on 6 Sep 2012 21:58
Just saying...
But then Chris, what about the Bookmarks, Pendorings, Adfocus, Apex, Eagles, Ad-Review, Creative Circle, and all the other PR, Editorial, Media, etc. local awards, do they not then fall into the same critism category as your article? Posted on 17 Sep 2012 17:09
Darren Mckay
What a load of kak. I wonder how many people have even taken notice of the price of 125g of cottage cheese in what is deemed to be the most effective advertising from Checkers or PnP? Now, I wonder (in percentages, chris) how many people have counted the number of times Floyd changed his outfit in that really awesome Santam ad? I will put my money on the latter. Purely because people want to be rescued from their daily grind. They want to count floyds outfits, they want to snigger at Nando's flamable humour, It's continously striving for the highest level of creativity that allows most good creatives to help brands see avenues and gaps where most brand manager cannot. Most brand managers do a fantastic annual report but have no clue on how to create a magical interpretation of their brief. Award shows keep the creative juices flowing. Without them Chris, I'm afraid we'll all end up like you. Very sad indeed. Long live the "pat on the back" for great creative thinking. Posted on 17 Sep 2012 18:01
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This Message Board accepts no liability of legal consequences that arise from the Message Boards (e.g. defamation, slander, or other such crimes). All posted messages are the sole property of their respective authors. The maintainer does retain the right to remove any message posts for whatever reasons. People that post messages to this forum are not to libel/slander nor in any other way depict a company, entity, individual(s), or service in a false light; should they do so, the legal consequences are theirs alone. Bizcommunity.com will disclose authors' IP addresses to authorities if compelled to do so by a court of law.

Subscribe to industry newsletters

Related tweets


Bizcommunity retains a dedicated editorial pool and a group of around 265 industry contributors, we always welcome additional contributions.

Subscribe

Receive free email newsletter

Make us your homepageAdd us to your favoritesRSS feedGet biz on your phoneFollow us

Invite

Tell a friend about us